Welcome to IBM Employee News and Links
"News and links for IBM employees, retirees, ex-employees, and persons interested in pension, retirement, off-shoring and corporate governance issues."
Web This Site

Quick Links:
  Get involved!
  Press articles
  Important Links
  Insider trading
  Lou's Contract
  Total Compensation
  Add or delete ID
  Change ID
  Contact site owner
Previous Highlights:
  April 21, 2007
  April 14, 2007
  April 7, 2007
  March 31, 2007
  March 24, 2007
  March 17, 2007
  March 10, 2007
  March 3, 2007
  February 24, 2007
  February 17, 2007
  February 10, 2007
  February 3, 2007
  January 27, 2007
  January 20, 2007
  January 13, 2007
  January 6, 2007
  December 30, 2006
  December 23, 2006
  December 16, 2006
  December 9, 2006
  December 2, 2006
  November 25, 2006
  November 18, 2006
  November 11, 2006
  November 4, 2006
  October 28, 2006
  October 21, 2006
  October 14, 2006
  October 7, 2006
  September 30, 2006
  September 23, 2006
  September 16, 2006
  September 9, 2006
  September 2, 2006
  August 26, 2006
  August 19, 2006
  August 12, 2006
  August 5, 2006
  July 29, 2006
  July 22, 2006
  July 15, 2006
  July 8, 2006
  July 1, 2006
  June 24, 2006
  June 17, 2006
  June 10, 2006
  June 3, 2006
  May 27, 2006
  May 20, 2006
  May 13, 2006
  May 6, 2006
  2006 Stock Meeting
  April 22, 2006
  April 15, 2006
  April 8, 2006
  April 1, 2006
  March 25, 2006
  March 18, 2006
  March 11, 2006
  March 4, 2006
  February 25, 2006
  February 18, 2006
  February 11, 2006
  February 4, 2006
  January 28, 2006
  January 21, 2006
  January 14, 2006
  January 7, 2006
  December 31, 2005
  December 24, 2005
  December 17, 2005
  December 10, 2005
  December 03, 2005
  November 26, 2005
  November 19, 2005
  November 12, 2005
  November 5, 2005
  October 29, 2005
  October 22, 2005
  October 15, 2005
  October 8, 2005
  October 1, 2005
  September 24, 2005
  September 17, 2005
  September 10, 2005
  September 3, 2005
  August 27, 2005
  August 20, 2005
  August 13, 2005
  August 6, 2005
  July 30, 2005
  July 23, 2005
  July 16, 2005
  July 9, 2005
  July 2, 2005
  June 25, 2005
  June 18, 2005
  June 11, 2005
  June 4, 2005
  May 28, 2005
  May 21, 2005
  May 14, 2005
  May 7, 2005
  April 30, 2005
  April 23, 2005
  April 16, 2005
  April 9, 2005
  April 2, 2005
  March 26, 2005
  March 19, 2005
  March 12, 2005
  March 5, 2005
  February 26, 2005
  February 19, 2005
  February 12, 2005
  February 5, 2005
  January 29, 2005
  January 22, 2005
  January 15, 2005
  January 8, 2005
  January 1, 2005
  December 25, 2004
  December 18, 2004
  December 11, 2004
  December 4, 2004
  November 27, 2004
  November 20, 2004
  November 13, 2004
  November 6, 2004
  October 30, 2004
  October 23, 2004
  October 16, 2004
  October 9, 2004
  October 2, 2004
  September 25, 2004
  September 18, 2004
  September 11, 2004
  September 4, 2004
  August 28, 2004
  August 21, 2004
  August 14, 2004
  August 7, 2004
  July 31, 2004
  July 24, 2004
  July 17, 2004
  July 10, 2004
  July 3, 2004
  June 26, 2004
  June 19, 2004
  June 5, 2004
  May 29, 2004
  May 22, 2004
  May 15, 2004
  May 8, 2004
  2004 Stock Meeting
  April 24, 2004
  April 10, 2004
  April 3, 2004
  March 27, 2004
  March 20, 2004
  March 13, 2004
  March 6, 2004
  February 28, 2004
  February 21, 2004
  February 14, 2004
  February 7, 2004
  February 1, 2004
  January 18, 2004
  December 27, 2003
  December 20, 2003
  December 13, 2003
  December 6, 2003
  November 29, 2003
  November 22, 2003
  November 15, 2003
  November 8, 2003
  November 1, 2003
  October 25, 2003
  October 18, 2003
  October 11, 2003
  October 4, 2003
  September 27, 2003
  September 20, 2003
  September 13, 2003
  September 6, 2003
  August 30, 2003
  August 23, 2003
  August 16, 2003
  August 9, 2003
  Pension Lawsuit Win
  July 26, 2003
  July 19, 2003
  July 12, 2003
  July 5, 2003
  June 28, 2003
  June 21, 2003
  June 14, 2003
  June 7, 2003
  May 31, 2003
  May 24, 2003
  May 17, 2003
  May 10, 2003
  2003 Stock Meeting
  April 26, 2003
  April 19, 2003
  April 12, 2003
  April 5, 2003
  March 29, 2003
  March 22, 2003
  March 15, 2003
  March 8, 2003
  March 1, 2003
  February 22, 2003
  February 15, 2003
  February 8, 2003
  February 1, 2003
  January 25, 2003
  January 18, 2003
  January 11, 2003
  January 4, 2003
  December 28, 2002
  December 21, 2002
  December 14, 2002
  December 7, 2002
  November 30, 2002
  November 23, 2002
  November 16, 2002
  November 9, 2002
  November 2, 2002
  October 26, 2002
  October 19, 2002
  October 12, 2002
  October 5, 2002
  September 28, 2002
  September 21, 2002
  September 14, 2002
  September 7, 2002
  August 31, 2002
  August 24, 2002
  August 17, 2002
  August 10, 2002
  August 3, 2002
  July 27, 2002
  July 20, 2002
  July 13, 2002
  July 6, 2002
  June 29, 2002
  June 22, 2002
  June 15, 2002
  June 8, 2002
  June 1, 2002
  May 25, 2002
  May 18, 2002
  May 11, 2002
  2002 Stock Meeting
  April 27, 2002
  April 20, 2002
  April 13, 2002
  April 6, 2002
  March 30, 2002
  March 23, 2002
  March 16, 2002
  March 9, 2002
  March 2, 2002
  February 23, 2002
  February 16, 2002
  February 9, 2002
  February 2, 2002
  January 26, 2002
  January 19, 2002
  January 12, 2002
  January 5, 2002
  December 29, 2001
  December 22, 2001
  December 15, 2001
  December 8, 2001
  December 1, 2001
  November 24, 2001
  November 17, 2001
  November 10, 2001
  November 3, 2001
  October 27, 2001
  October 20, 2001
  October 13, 2001
  October 6, 2001
  September 29, 2001
  September 22, 2001
  September 15, 2001
  September 8, 2001
  September 1, 2001
  August 25, 2001
  August 18, 2001
  August 11, 2001
  August 4, 2001
  July 28, 2001
  July 21, 2001
  July 14, 2001
  July 7, 2001
  June 30, 2001
  June 23, 2001
  June 16, 2001
  June 9, 2001
  June 2, 2001
  May 26, 2001
  May 19, 2001
  May 12, 2001
  May 5, 2001
  2001 Stock Meeting
  April 21, 2001
  April 14, 2001
  April 7, 2001
  March 31, 2001
  March 24, 2001
  March 17, 2001
  March 10, 2001
  March 3, 2001
  February 24, 2001
  February 17, 2001
  February 10, 2001
  February 3, 2001
  January 27, 2001
  January 20, 2001
  January 13, 2001
  January 6, 2001
  December 30, 2000
  December 23, 2000
  December 16, 2000
  December 9, 2000
  December 2, 2000
  November 24, 2000
  November 17, 2000
  November 10, 2000
  November 4, 2000
  October 28, 2000
  October 21, 2000
  October 14, 2000
  October 7, 2000
  September 30, 2000
  September 23, 2000
  September 16, 2000
  September 9, 2000
  September 2, 2000
  August 26, 2000
  August 19, 2000
  August 12, 2000
  July 29, 2000
  July 22, 2000
  July 15, 2000
  July 1, 2000
  June 24, 2000
  June 17, 2000
  June 10, 2000
  June 3, 2000
  May 27, 2000
  May 20, 2000
  May 13, 2000
  May 6, 2000
  April, 2000

Join your fellow employees who are fighting for your benefits - Join the Alliance!

Retirees, Vendors, Contractors, Temps, and Active Employees are all eligible to become members of the Alliance.

    Highlights for week ending April 12, 2003
  • St. Louis Post-Dispatch: IBM workers tell panel pension changes unfair. Excerpt: "When Kathi Cooper of Bethalto, Ill., an employee of International Business Machines Corp., addressed a panel of Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Department officials, she was angry, like many others who'd traveled to Washington to protest proposed changes in pension rules. 'This isn't about me,' she told the panel Wednesday. 'This is about millions and millions of baby boomers (who) will be harmed when they can least take it.' Cooper is a lead plaintiff in a class-action lawsuit against IBM for switching pension plans in the middle of her 25-year career with the company. The result of the change, she learned, is a 64 percent drop in what she can expect to receive in retirement." If link is broken, view Adobe Acrobat version [PDF--16 KB].

  • Wall Street Journal: US Lawmakers Aim To Stop Treasury Pension Regulations, by Jennifer Corbett Dooren. Excerpts: "Legislation in both the House and Senate was introduced Tuesday that would require the Treasury Department to withdraw its proposed rules on pensions. The proposed rules, which will be the subject of a two-day Treasury and Internal Revenue Service public hearing starting Wednesday, aim to give companies guidance on converting their defined-benefit pension plans into cash-balance plans. The legislation, by Reps. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and George Miller, D-Calif., would require Treasury to drop its proposal." ... "Sanders recently had the Congressional Research Service conduct a study on what would happen if congressional pensions were converted from a defined-benefit plan to a cash-balance plan. He said most lawmakers, including himself, would lose money on the deal. The CRS analysis showed that House Speaker Dennis Hastert would lose 69% of the pension's value if converted. The pension was valued at $540,572 as of Dec. 31, 2002. If it was converted to a cash-balance plan the value would have been $164,455."

  • American Benefits Council to Congress: Mandated 'Choice of Plan' Bill is Ill-Advised Pension Legislation. [PDF] Excerpt: "Representative Bernard Sanders (I-VT) will be introducing legislation very shortly that would mandate that employers converting from one form of defined benefit pension plan to another type of defined benefit pension plan would be required to obtain the employees’ consent. Rep. Sanders is seeking support and co-sponsors for this ill-advised proposal. We urge you to carefully consider some of the serious negative consequences for workers and their employers of such a 'mandated choice' measure before you commit to co-sponsor or otherwise support this proposal. The attached is offered for your thoughtful consideration."

  • Watson-Wyatt Press Release: Most Conversions to Cash Balance Pensions Are Cost-Neutral -- and 80 Percent of Employees Actually Fare Better. Excerpt: "As the debate over cash balance and pension equity plans heats up following the release of proposed new rules governing these plans, experts at Watson Wyatt warn that common misperceptions still abound. 'Critics try to paint all conversions to cash balance plans as attempts by companies to cut costs at the expense of workers, but the facts simply do not support these assertions,' said Sylvester Schieber, vice president of research at Watson Wyatt. (Editor's note: Watson-Wyatt is a consulting firm that has assisted many companies in their transitions to cash balance pension plans).

  • Wall Street Journal: Bill Seeks to Shield Pensions Switched to Cash Balance Plans, by Ellen E. Schultz and Theo Francis. Excerpt: "Lawmakers introduced legislation in the House and Senate aimed at protecting older workers whose companies convert their pensions to cash balance plans, while elsewhere in Washington hearings employer groups lobbied in favor of preserving retirement arrangements for highly paid executives. Rep. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) introduced a bill that would require companies that convert to cash balance plans to allow workers who are age 40 or have at least 10 years of service the choice of receiving the benefit they would have accrued under the traditional pension plan at retirement. The proposal has 116 co-signers; an identical bill was introduced in the Senate by Sen. Tom Harkin (D., Iowa). Both measures are supported by the AARP, the AFL-CIO, CWA, and employee groups. The legislation would also forbid companies from low-balling the value of pensions earned by older workers when they establish opening account balances. The result is that an older employee may work for years before his pension builds back up to what it had been before the change. Younger or newly hired workers begin to build a benefit right away."

  • Wall Street Journal: Treasury Move May Ease Shifts To 'Cash-Balance' Pension Plans, by Ellen E. Schultz and Theo Francis. Excerpt: "Companies may find it easier to convert their pensions to 'cash-balance' pension plans, thanks to an announcement by the Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service. The agencies said they were withdrawing a provision in their proposed rules on cash-balance plans that requires employers to adhere to a law designed to help ensure that pensions don't discriminate against lower-paid workers."

  • Seyfarth Shaw Management Alert: IRS Gives Cash Balance Plans Half a Loaf [PDF]. Excerpt: "The IRS's recent withdrawal of part, but not all, of its controversial cash balance plan regulations illustrates the old saying that half a loaf is better than none. This Management Alert describes the difficult position that continues for cash balance plans."
  • ... "The IRS withdrew only the portion of the regulation dealing with discrimination in favor of highly compensated employees (HCEs). It did not withdraw the equally controversial age discrimination regulations. In fact, although there have been persistent rumors that the age discrimination regulations would be withdrawn as well, a two-day public hearing on the age discrimination rules was held on April 9 and 20, 2003."

  • USA Today: Hearings to debate cash-balance plans. Excerpts: "Employee activists from across the USA urged Congress Tuesday to enact legislation protecting workers at companies that switch to controversial cash-balance pension plans. On the eve of hearings on proposed Treasury Department regulations sanctioning cash-balance plans, workers from companies such as IBM, Verizon and AT&T joined members of AARP, labor unions and the Pension Rights Center in Washington to protest the proposal and support a bill sponsored by Rep. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. George Miller, D-Calif. The bill, introduced Tuesday, is endorsed by more than 100 members of Congress. Among other provisions, it would require employers that switch from a traditional pension to a cash-balance plan to let workers age 40 or older or who have worked 10 years or more for the company choose between the plans."

  • Dow Jones News Service: Treasury, IRS Urged To Change Pension Regulations, by Jennifer Corbett Doorden. Excerpt: "House lawmakers, middle-aged workers and even a group of large employers Wednesday urged the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service to change proposed rules governing pensions. The agencies are holding a two-day hearing on the rules, which are designed to give companies guidance on converting their traditional defined-benefit pension plans into cash-balance plans." ... "During the 1990s, several companies, such as International Business Machines Corp. (IBM), converted their defined-benefit plans into cash-balance plans, prompting the outcry of older workers who charged that the change violated age-discrimination laws. Three years ago, Treasury and the IRS stopped sanctioning the switch to cash-balance plans until rules are put into place governing the switch from a traditional pension to a cash-balance plan."

  • Washington Post: Pension Proposal Is Under Fire. Employers Seek Flexibility; Employees Fear Losing Benefits. Excerpt: "Critics say companies implement cash-balance plans to cut costs, and often rely on the complexity of pension calculations to hide that fact from workers. 'A lot of workers do not know what is happening to them,' said Rep. Bernard Sanders (I-Vt.). Sanders and other members of Congress proposed legislation that would require employers that convert to cash-balance plans to give workers the option to remain in old plans. Workers from companies such as International Business Machines Corp. and AT&T Corp. testified that when their employers implemented cash-balance plans, their retirement benefits were reduced by as much as half."

  • Janet Krueger reports on the Treasury Department hearing. Excerpts: "Most of the consultants talk in black and white terms about companies who convert from traditional pension plans to cash balance plans. They talk about 'wear away' not being a significant problem, because it isn't significant when averaged out over an employee's career... Here again, you need to take a look at the real world. IBM converted my pension FOUR times in the 90s -- each time my earned benefits came close to catching up to my frozen protected benefits, they changed the plan again... Older workers at IBM in the 90s, who thought their dedication to their company was earning them good pensions when they retired, were actually earning no benefits at all!!! Companies have threatened that if the compliance rules are too strict, they won't provide pension plans at all. You've suggested workers would rather sacrifice part of their pension than see it dropped entirely... But you're not paying attention -- the problem is that when workers THINK they are earning pension benefits, and in reality are not, they don't compensate by saving money for themselves. If a teenager comes to you for advice
    about sex, and you tell him if that if he does engage in sex he needs to at least do it safely, would you offer him a box of condoms that have been sitting on the shelf for 30 years and are full of holes??? NO!!! You know he is FAR BETTER OFF if he KNOWS he doesn't have any protection." ... "Btw, the consultant who insisted that in all of his years of experience, he has never seen an actual pension plan that discriminates against older workers in the ways so many of the employees who spoke at the hearing were claiming, happens to be one of the lead attorneys working for IBM on Cooper v. IBM!!!"

  • "just_a_bean_counter" reports on his impression of the Treasury Department hearing.

  • Newsday: Cash Balance Pensions Debated. Excerpt: "The Treasury Department has breathed new life into cash balance pensions conversions - which had been popular in the 1990s before being halted by the Clinton Administration in 1999 after a flurry of employee protests - by proposing in December that such plans don't discriminate on the basis of age. Officials listened to more than five hours of testimony from both plan opponents and supporters at yesterday's hearing in Washington, which continues today. A decision, however, is not expected for several months. It remains to be seen whether the Bush administration will side with employers - who say they can't afford to maintain costly traditional pensions in tough economic times - or with workers, who have mounted a vocal campaign to block the proposal." ... "For Lazzaro Cuttrone of Bridgewater, N.J., who worked for AT&T for 31 years, the conversion meant he's only collecting $23,000 in retirement instead of the $47,000 projected before AT&T switched its plan."

  • New York Times: A Plan to Recalculate Pensions. Excerpt: "Corporations would find billions of dollars of pension shortfalls eliminated overnight under a proposal being prepared to address a longstanding issue in pension accounting. The proposed legislation, being drafted by a Democrat and a Republican who sponsored changes in retirement laws in 2001, would create a permanent replacement for the 30-year bond in certain pension calculations. An interim measure, allowing companies to use a more favorable rate, is set to expire at the end of the year. The proposal, embraced by the nation's biggest corporations, would use a rate that is tied to high-rated corporate bonds and that is higher than both the interim measure and the rate that companies have traditionally used to measure their pension obligations. The higher rate, known as the discount rate, makes obligations to retirees look smaller, at least on paper." If link is broken, view Adobe Acrobat version [PDF--65 KB].

  • New York Times: Proposal on Pension Conversion Attacked. Excerpt: "Cash-balance pensions captured the spotlight in 1999 after employees at I.B.M. discovered that a conversion by that company was reducing employees' benefits by tens of thousands of dollars in some cases. The harshest effects befell workers with the most seniority. An age-discrimination lawsuit followed, along with a political uproar. The Internal Revenue Service, one of three agencies that regulate pension plans, has stopped approving cash-balance conversions while experts sort out the legal issues. The new regulations, issued in December, are the Bush administration's proposal to resolve the age-discrimination issue."

  • Siskind's Immigration Bulletin: Firebell in the Night: The Coming L-1 Crisis and What We Can Do About It, by Gary Endelman. Excerpt: "As the H-1B has become more radioactive, interested employers have increasingly turned to the L-1 as a less onerous alternative unburdened by labor union attack and DOL oversight. New L-1s soared by 50% between 1998 and 2002; the first 5 months of fiscal 2003 saw an additional 10% rise in L usage according to State Department data. Over this same period, by contrast, H-1B visas fell by 27% through 2002 and another 17% thus far in FY 2003. There were 384,000 H-1B temporary workers in 2001 while 329,000, nearly as many, were working here as L-1 intracompany transfers. The continuing debate over H-1Bs has so sucked all the oxygen out of employment based immigration that, below the radar, few have noticed that the L-1 has begun to replace it as the work visa of choice. Critical articles on the L1 are not new. What is different is that such negative treatment is no longer confined to the nativist fringe but has crossed over into the mainstream press. That is why the Business Week story on major US companies outsourcing their IT functions, laying off Americans and replacing them with L-1 international workers supplied by Tata Consulting, India's largest technology consulting firm, should be, to quote Thomas Jefferson's reaction to the Missouri Compromise, a "firebell in the night" to the immigration bar and its business clients."

  • Urban Institute: Letting Older Workers Work: Rethinking Retirement Policies.

  • New York Times: Workers Who Feel Discarded by Bob Herbert. Excerpt: "Among the many things overshadowed by the war is the substantial human toll that is quietly being taken by the faltering U.S. economy. Putting Americans to work is not part of the agenda of the Bush administration, and the fallout from this lack of interest is spreading big time. The U.S. is hemorrhaging jobs. On Friday the government reported that 108,000 more jobs were lost in March. Some 2.4 million jobs have vanished since the nation's payrolls peaked two years ago."

  • The (United Kingdom) Guardian: US ignores losses on jobs front. Excerpts: "Baghdad fever gripped the markets yesterday as investors shrugged off another set of grisly US job figures to focus on the American forces' advance on Iraq's capital. But analysts said the grim news on the jobs front suggested an end to the war may not bring the hoped-for rapid recovery. US firms shed 108,000 jobs in March, according to the labour department, the second month in a row of hefty losses."

  • eWeek: Perils of Going Offshore by Lisa Vaas. Excerpts: "It's no secret the United States has been hemorrhaging IT jobs. The American Electronics Association reported recently that the United States lost 560,000 high-tech jobs between January 2001 and December 2002. That works out to a 20 percent shrinkage in high-tech manufacturing positions and a 9 percent drop in communications services employment. All in all, the AEA found, the U.S. IT work force shrank by 9.8 percent during the past two years. And, as the economic slowdown continues, the domestic IT work force is still shriveling, and layoff announcements keep coming. But the slow economy isn't the only cause of the shrinking IT job market in the United States. Offshore outsourcing accounts for a sizable portion of this loss. Analysts say that, during the next 10-plus years, more than 3 million U.S. white-collar jobs will be lost to offshore outsourcing. Many will be IT jobs. The loss in wages is forecast by some analysts to reach as high as $100 billion."

  • Raleigh News and Observer: North Carolina Study Questions Benefit of State Business Tax Credits. Excerpts: "Last year, IBM won $554,000 in state tax credits for creating jobs, though it has been reducing its payroll ever since. First Union of Charlotte claimed $780,000 in equipment upgrades -- then merged with Wachovia so both banks could streamline operations. Discount retailer Family Dollar of Matthews claimed $292,000 in tax breaks for research and development."

  • Janet Krueger: Final oral arguments were heard today in the appeal of Berger v Xerox Retirement -- Judge Posner's comments are especially interesting. The court posted a recording of the final discussion on their web site; some of it is a bit difficult to hear, but it is worth listening to. Listen. (Requires Windows Media Player or other media player capable of playing MPEG audio. Running length: 47 minutes).

  • Dow Jones Newswire: Cos. May Face Talent Shortage As Baby Boomers Retire. Excerpt: "Companies could soon be faced with a severe shortage of talent and skills unless they take steps to encourage older employees to delay their retirements. With an estimated 77 million baby boomers set to retire, productivity in many organizations is likely to suffer unless companies find ways to retain their skills and experience, according to a report released Thursday by the Conference Board."


This week on the Alliance@IBM Site:



"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have too much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." — Franklin D. Roosevelt
This site is designed to allow IBM Employees to communicate and share methods of protecting their rights through the establishment of an IBM Employees Labor Union. Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act states it is a violation for Employers to spy on union gatherings, or pretend to spy. For the purpose of the National Labor Relations Act, notice is given that this site and all of its content, messages, communications, or other content is considered to be a union gathering.