Welcome to IBM Employee News and Links
"News and links for IBM employees, retirees, ex-employees, and persons interested in pension, retirement, off-shoring and corporate governance issues."
Web This Site

Quick Links:
  Get involved!
  Press articles
  Important Links
  Insider trading
  Lou's Contract
  Total Compensation
  Add or delete ID
  Change ID
  Contact site owner
Previous Highlights:
  April 21, 2007
  April 14, 2007
  April 7, 2007
  March 31, 2007
  March 24, 2007
  March 17, 2007
  March 10, 2007
  March 3, 2007
  February 24, 2007
  February 17, 2007
  February 10, 2007
  February 3, 2007
  January 27, 2007
  January 20, 2007
  January 13, 2007
  January 6, 2007
  December 30, 2006
  December 23, 2006
  December 16, 2006
  December 9, 2006
  December 2, 2006
  November 25, 2006
  November 18, 2006
  November 11, 2006
  November 4, 2006
  October 28, 2006
  October 21, 2006
  October 14, 2006
  October 7, 2006
  September 30, 2006
  September 23, 2006
  September 16, 2006
  September 9, 2006
  September 2, 2006
  August 26, 2006
  August 19, 2006
  August 12, 2006
  August 5, 2006
  July 29, 2006
  July 22, 2006
  July 15, 2006
  July 8, 2006
  July 1, 2006
  June 24, 2006
  June 17, 2006
  June 10, 2006
  June 3, 2006
  May 27, 2006
  May 20, 2006
  May 13, 2006
  May 6, 2006
  2006 Stock Meeting
  April 22, 2006
  April 15, 2006
  April 8, 2006
  April 1, 2006
  March 25, 2006
  March 18, 2006
  March 11, 2006
  March 4, 2006
  February 25, 2006
  February 18, 2006
  February 11, 2006
  February 4, 2006
  January 28, 2006
  January 21, 2006
  January 14, 2006
  January 7, 2006
  December 31, 2005
  December 24, 2005
  December 17, 2005
  December 10, 2005
  December 03, 2005
  November 26, 2005
  November 19, 2005
  November 12, 2005
  November 5, 2005
  October 29, 2005
  October 22, 2005
  October 15, 2005
  October 8, 2005
  October 1, 2005
  September 24, 2005
  September 17, 2005
  September 10, 2005
  September 3, 2005
  August 27, 2005
  August 20, 2005
  August 13, 2005
  August 6, 2005
  July 30, 2005
  July 23, 2005
  July 16, 2005
  July 9, 2005
  July 2, 2005
  June 25, 2005
  June 18, 2005
  June 11, 2005
  June 4, 2005
  May 28, 2005
  May 21, 2005
  May 14, 2005
  May 7, 2005
  April 30, 2005
  April 23, 2005
  April 16, 2005
  April 9, 2005
  April 2, 2005
  March 26, 2005
  March 19, 2005
  March 12, 2005
  March 5, 2005
  February 26, 2005
  February 19, 2005
  February 12, 2005
  February 5, 2005
  January 29, 2005
  January 22, 2005
  January 15, 2005
  January 8, 2005
  January 1, 2005
  December 25, 2004
  December 18, 2004
  December 11, 2004
  December 4, 2004
  November 27, 2004
  November 20, 2004
  November 13, 2004
  November 6, 2004
  October 30, 2004
  October 23, 2004
  October 16, 2004
  October 9, 2004
  October 2, 2004
  September 25, 2004
  September 18, 2004
  September 11, 2004
  September 4, 2004
  August 28, 2004
  August 21, 2004
  August 14, 2004
  August 7, 2004
  July 31, 2004
  July 24, 2004
  July 17, 2004
  July 10, 2004
  July 3, 2004
  June 26, 2004
  June 19, 2004
  June 5, 2004
  May 29, 2004
  May 22, 2004
  May 15, 2004
  May 8, 2004
  2004 Stock Meeting
  April 24, 2004
  April 10, 2004
  April 3, 2004
  March 27, 2004
  March 20, 2004
  March 13, 2004
  March 6, 2004
  February 28, 2004
  February 21, 2004
  February 14, 2004
  February 7, 2004
  February 1, 2004
  January 18, 2004
  December 27, 2003
  December 20, 2003
  December 13, 2003
  December 6, 2003
  November 29, 2003
  November 22, 2003
  November 15, 2003
  November 8, 2003
  November 1, 2003
  October 25, 2003
  October 18, 2003
  October 11, 2003
  October 4, 2003
  September 27, 2003
  September 20, 2003
  September 13, 2003
  September 6, 2003
  August 30, 2003
  August 23, 2003
  August 16, 2003
  August 9, 2003
  Pension Lawsuit Win
  July 26, 2003
  July 19, 2003
  July 12, 2003
  July 5, 2003
  June 28, 2003
  June 21, 2003
  June 14, 2003
  June 7, 2003
  May 31, 2003
  May 24, 2003
  May 17, 2003
  May 10, 2003
  2003 Stock Meeting
  April 26, 2003
  April 19, 2003
  April 12, 2003
  April 5, 2003
  March 29, 2003
  March 22, 2003
  March 15, 2003
  March 8, 2003
  March 1, 2003
  February 22, 2003
  February 15, 2003
  February 8, 2003
  February 1, 2003
  January 25, 2003
  January 18, 2003
  January 11, 2003
  January 4, 2003
  December 28, 2002
  December 21, 2002
  December 14, 2002
  December 7, 2002
  November 30, 2002
  November 23, 2002
  November 16, 2002
  November 9, 2002
  November 2, 2002
  October 26, 2002
  October 19, 2002
  October 12, 2002
  October 5, 2002
  September 28, 2002
  September 21, 2002
  September 14, 2002
  September 7, 2002
  August 31, 2002
  August 24, 2002
  August 17, 2002
  August 10, 2002
  August 3, 2002
  July 27, 2002
  July 20, 2002
  July 13, 2002
  July 6, 2002
  June 29, 2002
  June 22, 2002
  June 15, 2002
  June 8, 2002
  June 1, 2002
  May 25, 2002
  May 18, 2002
  May 11, 2002
  2002 Stock Meeting
  April 27, 2002
  April 20, 2002
  April 13, 2002
  April 6, 2002
  March 30, 2002
  March 23, 2002
  March 16, 2002
  March 9, 2002
  March 2, 2002
  February 23, 2002
  February 16, 2002
  February 9, 2002
  February 2, 2002
  January 26, 2002
  January 19, 2002
  January 12, 2002
  January 5, 2002
  December 29, 2001
  December 22, 2001
  December 15, 2001
  December 8, 2001
  December 1, 2001
  November 24, 2001
  November 17, 2001
  November 10, 2001
  November 3, 2001
  October 27, 2001
  October 20, 2001
  October 13, 2001
  October 6, 2001
  September 29, 2001
  September 22, 2001
  September 15, 2001
  September 8, 2001
  September 1, 2001
  August 25, 2001
  August 18, 2001
  August 11, 2001
  August 4, 2001
  July 28, 2001
  July 21, 2001
  July 14, 2001
  July 7, 2001
  June 30, 2001
  June 23, 2001
  June 16, 2001
  June 9, 2001
  June 2, 2001
  May 26, 2001
  May 19, 2001
  May 12, 2001
  May 5, 2001
  2001 Stock Meeting
  April 21, 2001
  April 14, 2001
  April 7, 2001
  March 31, 2001
  March 24, 2001
  March 17, 2001
  March 10, 2001
  March 3, 2001
  February 24, 2001
  February 17, 2001
  February 10, 2001
  February 3, 2001
  January 27, 2001
  January 20, 2001
  January 13, 2001
  January 6, 2001
  December 30, 2000
  December 23, 2000
  December 16, 2000
  December 9, 2000
  December 2, 2000
  November 24, 2000
  November 17, 2000
  November 10, 2000
  November 4, 2000
  October 28, 2000
  October 21, 2000
  October 14, 2000
  October 7, 2000
  September 30, 2000
  September 23, 2000
  September 16, 2000
  September 9, 2000
  September 2, 2000
  August 26, 2000
  August 19, 2000
  August 12, 2000
  July 29, 2000
  July 22, 2000
  July 15, 2000
  July 1, 2000
  June 24, 2000
  June 17, 2000
  June 10, 2000
  June 3, 2000
  May 27, 2000
  May 20, 2000
  May 13, 2000
  May 6, 2000
  April, 2000

Join your fellow employees who are fighting for your benefits - Join the Alliance!

Retirees, Vendors, Contractors, Temps, and Active Employees are all eligible to become members of the Alliance.

    Highlights—July 17, 2004
  • "m_l_benefit_seeker", one of the first IBMers eligible to retire under the new Future Health Account details the charges IBM levies for health care coverage under the FHA. Excerpts: I'm eligible to retire this week, so I thought I'd check out the
    Future Hell Account rates and post them here.
    • PPO for FHA: $499.54/month for employee; $999/month for employee + 1 dependent; $ 1498/month for employee + 2 dependents. The previous prices are subject to $507 deductible per person.
    • HMO for FHA (Health Partners): $360.85/month for employee; $721.71/month for employee + 1 dependent; $1082.56/month for employee + 2 dependents. The above HMO prices are subject to $14 co-payment per visit.
    • Medco Health low cost prescriptions are included in the previous prices, but dental and vision is not.
    • Dental for FHA: $33.70/month for employee; $ 67.54/month for employee + 1; $ 100.86/month for employee + 2 dependents.
    • As an employee, I presently have the PPO; Prices are: $62/month for employee + 2 dependents, subject to $507 deductible; IBM Dental Basic: $17/month for employee + 2.

  • Janet Krueger comments on the costs of the FHA plan. Full excerpt: This is not news. The rates are not very far out of line with what IBM has been charging for COBRA. I posted in 1999 that those who were allowed to retire with the FHA would get a maximum of 3 years of insurance out of it, unless IBM eliminated it, or them, before they reached age 55. As I've observed before:
    • Most older workers at IBM aren't being allowed to work until they turn 55, so they won't get anything from the FHA.
    • The FHA is not federally protected and never vests, so it would be foolish for even those who do stay at IBM until they turn 55 to rely on it -- IBM can eliminate the plan at any time, and would not have to replace it with anything.
    • Those who do get to use the FHA, are in a non-competitive (monopoly) situation where the only choice is whatever IBM chooses to offer, so don't expect all illnesses, drugs, etc. to be covered.
    • Current retirees don't have it much better -- before long their copay will be just as high as those who don't have retiree insurance -- but because of the latest Medicare hose act, IBM will get a tax-free subsidy equal to whatever they provide for retirees PLUS whatever they manage to connect from retirees -- great for IBM's bottom line, but not much good for the rest of us.
    • Current employees have multiple options:
      1. Work to unionize and get whatever is left of retiree health care promises protected with a union contract.
      2. Stick their heads in the sand and pretend everything will be ok.
      3. Start saving everything they can in hopes that it will be enough to buy health insurance on the open market.
      4. Start lobbying for national health care coverage, similar to what every other industrialized country has.
      5. Quit and try to find a job with a different company that offers higher benefits (although unless you find one with a union contract, those benefits, too, could vaporize).
      6. Some combination of the above.
    • Personally, I'm working on option 4. When I see the millions of Americans with no health insurance coverage at all, including 2 of my kids who are grown and on their own, it doesn't seem smart for me to just focus on the future needs of those who still have good jobs at IBM...

  • New York Times commentary by Paul Krugman: Medical Class Warfare. Excerpts: If past patterns are any guide, about one in three Americans will go without health insurance for some part of the next two years. They won't, for the most part, be the persistently poor, who are usually covered by Medicaid. They will be members of working families with breadwinners who have jobs without medical benefits or who have been laid off. ... The other main component of the Bush plan involves "health savings accounts." The prescription drug bill the Bush administration pushed through Congress last year had a number of provisions unrelated to Medicare. One of them allowed people who purchase insurance policies with high deductibles, generally at least $2,000 per family, to shelter income from taxes by setting up special accounts for medical expenses. This year, the administration proposed making the premiums linked to these accounts fully tax-deductible.

    Although the 2005 budget presents that new deduction under the heading "Helping the uninsured," health savings accounts don't seem to have much to do with the needs of the families likely to find themselves without health insurance. For one thing, such families need more protection than a plan with a $2,000 deductible provides. Furthermore, the tax advantages of health savings accounts would be small for those families most at risk of losing health insurance, who are overwhelmingly in low tax brackets. But for people whose income puts them in high tax brackets, these accounts are a very good deal; making the premiums deductible turns them into a great deal. In other words, health savings accounts will offer the already affluent, who don't have problems getting health insurance, yet another tax shelter. Meanwhile, health savings accounts, in the view of many experts, will actually increase the number of uninsured.

    This perverse effect shouldn't be too surprising: unless they are carefully designed, medical policies often have side consequences that worsen the problems they supposedly address. For example, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that one-third of the retirees who now have drug coverage through their former employers will lose that coverage as a result of the Bush prescription drug bill and will be forced to accept inferior coverage from Medicare. In the case of health savings accounts, the key side consequence is a reduced incentive for companies to insure their workers. When companies provide group health insurance, healthier employees implicitly subsidize their sicker colleagues. They're willing to do this largely because the employer's contributions to health insurance are a tax-free form of compensation, but only if the same plan is offered to all employees. Tax-free health savings accounts and premiums would provide healthier and wealthier employees an incentive to opt out, accepting higher paychecks instead, and would lead to higher insurance premiums for those who remain in traditional plans. This would cause some companies to stop providing health insurance, or raise employee contributions to a level some workers can't afford. If link is broken, view Adobe Acrobat version [PDF--18 KB].

  • While answering another person's Yahoo! message board posting, "ctman1452" describes how society has changed in recent decades and why the only viable long-term solution to the U.S.'s health care crisis is a national health care plan. Full excerpt: Well Carl your fatalistic attitude is one way to look at it but there are alternatives. Taking care of elders was considered part of the extended family's duties in the era you mention; today children not only have been relieved of that obligation legally but socially have been isolated from their parents by distance and working circumstances in many cases (out of sight out of mind). As a child I remember visiting friends houses and usually seeing "granny" in her room which was the case in my house as well except it was "gramps".

    People did not have the longevity they do today so they worked almost to their demise and were not considered "surplus" before they reached 50 or even 40 as many are in today's high tech world where recent education is a key job requirement to be effective and careers time out well before retirement. Age discrimination (caused partially by fear of health care costs) makes all this talk of "retraining" mostly a smoke screen and who is going to pay for retraining in any meaningful way at the same time we are "offshoring" many of those very same jobs to cheap foreign labor locations. Because of our heritage of not liking anything "centralized" because we fear another King George we usually attempt to solve any problem with a cut and paste solution of private/public content and health care is a perfect example of this. Lack of cell phone spectrum standards is another "bad example" unlike the rest of the world that adopted GSM first and now is gradually becoming the standard for the US because of its obvious advantages.

    The current extended longevity coupled with truncated careers caused by technology demands a better way. That better way is a national health plan adopted by the rest of the developed world; there simply is no other humane and equitable alternative to the inescapable demands of old age...there is also no "profit" potential to taking care of destitute old people to incent the market system. Whichever political party supports this inevitable solution is the one to favor...that is the easiest aspect of all this discussion by simple process of elimination. I and many others could go on and on but the logical conclusion of the obvious "solution" is the same; everything else is a "smoke screen" by the status quo who will try to escape their fair share of the taxes to pay for it and use every clever strategy to confuse as many people as possible to delay the inevitable.

  • Boulder Daily Camera commentary by Christopher Brauchli: Lower Prices for Drugs? Good Luck. Excerpts: Just when you thought it couldn't get any better, it got better. The month of June brought us not only the Approved Prescription Drug Discount Cards program but a lottery. ... According to the House Government Reform Committee, in many instances seniors will pay more for the drugs with the cards than buying drugs retail. The committee discovered that a one-month supply of the 10 best-selling brand-name drugs would cost more if purchased with a card offered by Pharmacy Care Alliance than if the same drugs were simply bought retail at Drugstore.com. The other drawback is that there are 72 cards from which to choose and each covers a different group of drugs. Once a participant has bought a card because of the selection of drugs and prices offered by that card, the purchaser is locked into that card until fall of the following year. The card issuer has slightly more flexibility. It can raise the price on those drugs in order to increase its profit. It cannot, of course, raise its prices willy nilly. Price increases can only occur once each week. That protects the consumer. ...

    As if the excitement of trying to buy a lucky card weren't enough for the elderly, on June 24 the administration announced a lottery. Between 500,000 and 600,000 people will be eligible to participate and 10 percent of them will be selected. To be eligible to enter the lottery entrants must have cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, multiple sclerosis and some other diseases. Congress appropriated $500 million for this program and the lucky winners will be selected at random. Forty percent of the funds will go to those taking oral drugs for cancer treatments and 60 percent will go to those with other illnesses. It is a preview of the benefits that will be available to all Medicare participants in 2006. Tommy Thompson, secretary of health and human services, explains that lottery winners "will save thousands of dollars on essential medicines that they can take home" and everyone who meets the eligibility criteria has an equal chance to win the lottery. The 450,000 to 550,000 people who need the drugs but don't win the lottery will have to wait until 2006, assuming they live that long. The losers may wonder what kind of a wealthy country establishes a program under which medicines to prolong life are only dispensed to the poor who win a lottery. Instead of carping they should be grateful that they don't live in a third world country where there aren't any lotteries to enter for medical care.

  • Plan Sponsor: One Bad Apple. Are all hybrid plans as bad as the negative publicity says they are? Not for three employers that made successful launches. Excerpts: “If you deal with the age discrimination issues, we do not think it is a bad plan design,” says Karen Friedman, policy director at the Washington-based Pension Rights Center. “Certain parts are good: They are employer-paid, and there are guarantees through the PBGC (Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.). Some workers like them because they are easy to understand, and they can carry the money with them.” Janet Krueger, the former IBM Corp. employee who helped expose problems with Big Blue’s cash balance conversion, puts it even more cautiously. “Some do seem to be in the best interests of employees, and some do not,” she says, “but nobody has sat down and said what makes a conversion fair and what makes it unfair. What is being done is ad hoc.”

    Saving money was not what motivated Kodak when the company started working on its new cash balance plan in the late 1990s, Metras says. ... Kodak’s current employees could pick between the old and new plans. “We offered a choice to everybody. If people had any concerns about the plan, they did not have to go with it,” Metras says. “Choice was pretty uncommon when we did ours. We thought this would be the cleanest thing to do.” ... Beyond giving employees the right to choose, Metras says, the other thing that made Kodak’s new plan work was the educational materials and resources it provided: “If you are offering a choice, you need to give people enough information to make a solid decision. We also did not rush it. They had plenty of time to make their decision.” Kodak gave every employee a “detailed” decision guide, Metras says, with a personalized fact sheet with numbers and graphics that projected their benefits in the old versus the new plan. If an employee could possibly get less money under the new plan versus the old, the numbers and graphics reflected that. The company also offered employees modeling software they could use to change assumptions, such as the interest rate. Other elements included employee meetings, a help line staffed by financial experts, and a Web site. If link is broken, view Adobe Acrobat version [PDF--33 KB].

  • Washington Post: Our Broken Health Care System. Excerpts: When Bill Frist talks about health care, it pays to listen. Not only is he the majority leader of the Senate, but, as a physician who specialized in heart transplants, he knows the medical system as well as he knows human anatomy. What the Tennessee Republican said at the National Press Club earlier this week confirms what many in the health field, in business and in both parties increasingly recognize: The American health care system is urgently in need of a basic overhaul. ... He spelled out some of the scary statistics behind those generalizations. Expense? The United States spends almost 15 percent of its income on health care, far more than other advanced countries. That's about $5,540 a year for every man, woman and child.

    Costs are rising four times as fast as wages. One informed estimate places the cost of employer-sponsored health care coverage for the average family at $14,500 in 2006, just two years from now. The Census Bureau found last year that almost 44 million Americans had gone without health insurance for the previous year. That number has been increasing by roughly 2 million a year. Families USA, a consumer group, says that almost 82 million people, one out of three below age 65, were uninsured at some point during 2002-03, most of them for at least nine months. Frist also talked about the "inefficiency" of the system, noting that "according to a recent Rand study, patients received recommended care about only half the time for conditions such as my own specialty of heart disease, as well as diabetes."

    Last month G. Richard Wagoner Jr., the chairman of General Motors, was quoted in the Detroit Free Press as telling a business conference that rising health care costs are crippling the competitiveness of U.S. business and should be the top issue for the winner of November's presidential election. "It is well beyond time for all of us to put partisan politics behind us," Wagoner said, "and get together to address this health care crisis." The message is coming through -- loud and clear. Whoever is president will find the issue waiting for him.

  • Business Week: 10 Employer Secrets Worth Cracking. From financial health to company culture, here's a look at some of the crucial info any prospective or current employee needs to know. Excerpts: Thank goodness the labor market is finally loosening up, and more good jobs are becoming available. Still, finding a new position is tough enough that you don't want to make a wrong move. So here's a critical point to consider: All employers have secrets that you'll want to uncover –- things like a drastically underfunded pension plan, a laissez-faire attitude toward new regulations, or using high tech to snoop on employees. Then there's the more intangible, but often the most serious, problem you need to watch out for: Getting stuck in a corporate culture where you don't fit in and have little chance of getting ahead. ... Will this company be able to take care of me in retirement? BusinessWeek's July 19 cover story, "The Benefits Trap", revealed that many large companies don't have enough assets to cover their pension obligations. At the same time, many of those companies are reducing retiree medical benefits in hopes of boosting the bottom line. A classic mistake most people make when contemplating a career move is to base their decision too much on annual compensation and forget to consider the value of benefits, says executive coach Paul Bernard, principal of Paul Bernard & Associates in New York. "For baby boomers this is a big issue," he says. ... What's the (real) travel and expense policy? This might sound like small potatoes, but for executives in sales or consulting, it's something to watch for, says Bernard. Just as cultures vary at different companies, so may one applaud you for taking clients out to a fancy lunch while another would wonder why coffee and a donut wouldn't suffice. Bernard says clients have recently complained to him that it can take 60 to 90 days to get reimbursed for expenses or that they're now required to fly coach. If you're going to be taking lots of trips to Europe and are accustomed to flying first class, this is something to check out.

  • Washington Post: Vision of Newt. As Speaker, Gingrich Knew How to Divide. Now He Aims to Unite -- to Transform Health Care as We Know It. Excerpt: Not that long ago, the very name Newt Gingrich made partisan blood boil. He was, after all, the renegade who shoved Democratic Rep. Jim Wright out of the speakership on ethics charges, devised the strategy for the 1994 Republican takeover of the House and memorably suggested Medicare ought to be left to "wither on the vine" (a reference he later said was aimed at the bureaucracy, not the actual program). So it is both a testament to his political skill and the salience of the issue that Gingrich is playing policy footsie with the likes of Rep. Kennedy, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) and William Novelli, executive director of AARP. Gingrich recently traveled to Rhode Island to deliver the keynote address at Kennedy's "Frontiers of Healthcare" conference. The pair, worlds apart ideologically, have found common ground around information technology and the promise it holds for revolutionizing the delivery of medical care.

  • New York Times: Medicare Law Is Seen Leading to Cuts in Drug Benefits for Retirees. Excerpt: New government estimates suggest that employers will reduce or eliminate prescription drug benefits for 3.8 million retirees when Medicare offers such coverage in 2006. That represents one-third of all the retirees with employer-sponsored drug coverage, according to documents from the Department of Health and Human Services. No aspect of the new Medicare law causes more concern among retirees than the possibility that they might lose benefits they already have.

  • Bloomberg.com: Automakers, "Losing Competitiveness," Join UAW in Health Fight. Excerpts: In another era, Geoffrey Schick and Ken Johnson might have clashed across a bargaining table. Schick, 33, is a health-cost specialist at DaimlerChrysler AG. Johnson, 54, is an autoworker focusing on benefits for UAW Local 72. Today, they share an office at the 1,400-worker DaimlerChrysler engine plant in Kenosha, Wisconsin, allies in a ground war against health expenses that are eating away every dollar the factory saves in hard-won productivity gains. "We are losing competitiveness," says Dieter Zetsche, 51, the handlebar-mustached chief executive of DaimlerChrysler's U.S. unit, based in Auburn Hills, Michigan.

  • Computerworld: Job cuts at computer firms on the upswing. The employment environment remains volatile, the outplacement firm says. Excerpt: Planned job cuts announced by computer firms rose a staggering 179% in the second quarter of this year, to 13,465 from 4,828 in the previous quarter, according to Chicago-based outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas Inc. Challenger said today that the rise in layoffs is a reminder that the job environment remains volatile and that significant job losses in technology-related industries may occur even as new positions are being created.

  • Computerworld: Regenerating IT. Excerpts: When an IT organization is badly damaged, outsourcing the whole thing is truly tempting, but such a desire often means "Let's abdicate all responsibility for IT." Such endeavors can be classified as "desperation outsourcing" and rarely succeed. Outsourcing IT can be successful, but not when the organization is damaged. Fix the problems first, then revisit outsourcing options. Like the damaged arm of a starfish, the failed IT organization needs to be regenerated, not amputated. Successful regeneration efforts require a strong CIO who will say "no" loudly and clearly when needed, even if it makes powerful executives unhappy.

  • New York Times Opinion by Paul Krugman: Machine at Work. Excerpt: From a business point of view, Enron is a smoking ruin. But there's important evidence in the rubble. If Enron hadn't collapsed, we might still have only circumstantial evidence that energy companies artificially drove up prices during California's electricity crisis. Because of that collapse, we have direct evidence in the form of the now-infamous Enron tapes — although the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Justice Department tried to prevent their release. Now, e-mail and other Enron documents are revealing why Tom DeLay, the House majority leader, is one of the most powerful men in America. ... Here's the puzzle: if Mr. DeLay's brand of conservatism is so unpopular that it must be kept in the closet during the convention, how can people like him really run the party? In Mr. DeLay's case, a large part of the answer is his control over corporate cash. As far back as 1996, one analyst described Mr. DeLay as the "chief enforcer of company contributions to Republicans." Some of that cash has flowed through Americans for a Republican Majority, called Armpac, a political action committee Mr. DeLay founded in 1994. By dispensing that money to other legislators, he gains their allegiance; this, in turn, allows him to deliver favors to his corporate contributors. Four of the five Republicans on the House ethics committee, where a complaint has been filed against Mr. DeLay, are past recipients of Armpac money. ... But you shouldn't conclude that the system is working. Mr. DeLay's current predicament is an accident. The party machine that he has done so much to create has eliminated most of the checks and balances in our government. Again and again, Republicans in Congress have closed ranks to block or emasculate politically inconvenient investigations. If Enron hadn't collapsed, and if Texas didn't still have a campaign finance law that is a relic of its populist past, Mr. DeLay would be in no danger at all. The larger picture is this: Mr. DeLay and his fellow hard-liners, whose values are far from the American mainstream, have forged an immensely effective alliance with corporate interests. And they may be just one election away from achieving a long-term lock on power. If link is broken, view Adobe Acrobat version [PDF--18 KB].

  • "madinpok" outlines the details of Sam Palmisano's retirement plan. Full excerpt: Sam will receive a pension from the normal IBM retirement plan based on the Service and Earnings formula or the Pension Credit Formula, whichever is greater at the time he retires. That should provide him with 30 - 40% of his 5 year final average salary. As an executive, Sam will also receive a second pension from the Supplemental Executive Retention Plan (SERP). For someone with 30 years of service, as Sam currently has, this will provide a pension of 63% of his final average salary. If he works 5 more years, it will provide 67%.

    So between the two pension plans, Sam will receive close to 100% of his salary as a pension. Assuming Sam continues to receive the same salary plus bonus of $6.9 million, as he did in 2003, that comes to about $575,000 per month. However, if the 15% raise that Sam got in 2003 continues to hold for 5 more years, his final average salary will be $9.37 million, giving him a pension of $780,992 per month. Of course, Sam is extremely thankful that Lou had the vision to create the SERP plan for the benefit of executives.
    • Linda Guyer comments. Full excerpt: I have no idea how Sam can look himself in the mirror each day. At this year's stockholder meeting, someone in the audience stood up and told about a retiree who had about $200 a month to live on from his pension after paying for medical; I believe she said something like "have you no shame?". So he hears this and then he goes to bed at night knowing he securely has over $8 million a year awaiting him. I personally could never do that. And I think it is pretty despicable.

  • Jim Hightower: Bush's Prosperity. Excerpts: What's wrong with you people? Don't you know that the economy is humming, that our very own president has declared "mission accomplished" on his promise of prosperity, that the stock market is up by 40 percent over last year, that jobs are cropping up like crabgrass, that the bluebird of happiness is officially singing everywhere across our land, and that you should be grateful, for gods sake? Republican politicians, corporate economists, and the media barons are totally befuddled these days, because their economic statistics tell them that the economy is in great shape––yet you, you wretches, are still grumpy, even giving Bush the lowest marks of his presidency for his economic stewardship. George himself has gone into one of his high-pitched whines, chastising those who "can't see the sunshine." He's sounding a whole lot like his daddy did back in '92 – like he's just another rich son-of-a-Bush who is totally oblivious to the realities of Americas workaday majority. He's looking at rosy economic indicators handed to him by his political operatives, rather than looking at such real-life pocketbook indicators as jobs that only pay poverty wages, gasoline topping $2 a gallon, milk at $4.43 a gallon, health-care costs rising three times faster than wages, and 401(k)s being shrunk to 1(k)s.

  • Harvard Business School: How To Tame CEO Compensation. Excerpts: In their book Working Capital: The Power of Labor's Pensions, the authors argue that by chasing short-term return, pension funds ignore the long-term interests of workers. This excerpt looks at the issue of how CEO compensation damages pensioners. In the 1980s, major corporations were cheered on by Wall Street as they went cost cutting with a vengeance. The announcement of mass layoffs generally sent stock prices soaring. Efforts to get cheaper labor through outsourcing or moving operations to developing nations raised short-term share prices. The market's rationale was that these measures would mean higher corporate profits, and higher profits should mean higher stock prices. ...

    Also worth noting is a pernicious side effect of excessive CEO pay. As mentioned above, the years since 1980 have seen a considerable increase in wage inequality, with those at the top gaining enormously at the expense of workers at the middle or bottom. It is likely that outlandish CEO pay encourages this trend not only because of its direct effect in shifting income upwards, but also through an indirect effect in creating new standards for corporate executives. If the CEO can make $20 million a year, then his or her assistants might believe that they should earn $1 million a year, and maybe that the employees just below them to earn $600,000 a year. High CEO pay can push up the whole pay scale at the top end of the spectrum to the detriment of ordinary workers and the long-term well-being of the company.

Coverage on H1-B and L1 Visa and Off-Shoring Issues
  • The Register (United Kingdom): IBM offshores 500 UK jobs to India. Excerpt: IBM is to move 500 UK jobs to India as part of a reorganisation of its outsourcing business, according to internal memos seen by The Register. According to the IBM memo, the consultation on the reorganisation involves 6,100 people. "We believe that between 1,000 and 1,500 people may have to consider taking IBM Standard Mobility clause to fulfil the requirements of the ABO [Assignment Based Organisation]", the memo states. So it appears IBM's plans to send jobs to India forms part of a much larger plan. According to a company insider, 350 out of 500 posts in IBM Strategic Outsourcing are to move to Bangalore. "IBM customers (although they do not yet know) can now expect to be talking to Indian employees," he said. In a memo announcing the "Assignment Based Organisation", IBM said that approximately "500 UK roles (300 full-time employees and 200 subcontractors) would be transitioned to Bangalore between Sept and Dec 2004". We put these points to IBM, which responded with a statement that implies that affected UK perms will be offered alternative employment.

  • The Register (United Kingdom): BBC Tech strike over outsourcing. Excerpt: BBC Technology staff have voted in favour of taking industrial action to show their opposition to the sell-off their department to Siemens. Bectu union members voted five to one in favour of industrial action. About a quarter of BBC Technology's 1400 staff are Bectu members. The union wants a delay to the sale, a three-year job guarantee for its members and pay increases of inflation plus 2.5 per cent for the same period. The BBC named Siemens as the single preferred bidder on 7 July. The union said in a statement: "Apart from the operational and financial risks posed by the sell-off, the savings target that led to the privatisation decision could have been achieved in-house, and the union would have agreed to job cuts if required."

  • WashTech: Your Tax Dollars At Work…Offshore: How Foreign Outsourcing Firms Are Capturing State Government Contracts [PDF]. Excerpts: Offshoring is going on to some degree in just about every state government.
    • At least 18 firms that specialize in offshore outsourcing are positioning
      themselves in no fewer than 30 states to capture a larger share of the state government market, especially in information technology services.
    • The 18 firms have already captured at least $75 million worth of work and are seeking more by gaining access to qualified-contractor lists, hiring former government officials from the “revolving door,” and even making state electoral campaign contributions.
    • The total amount or value of state contract offshoring cannot be estimated, because most state governments do not know where their contracted-out service work is performed. State officials know whether work is done onsite at the offices of the agency that commissioned it or offsite, but “offsite” could mean the other side of town or the other side of the world.
    • Because subcontracting is so common, states are often unaware of the exact identity and location of the company that is ultimately performing the work. States award contracts to U.S. firms and assume the work will be done domestically, but then the company subcontracts to an offshore firm.
    • Companies that appear to be domestic sometimes are not. States may think they are dealing with a U.S. firm because it has a domestic mailing address, but sometimes that address is just a marketing office for a company that is based offshore; other firms are technically headquartered

  • WashTech Call to Action: A new report by the Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First spotlights the growing degree to which state governments are contracting with foreign outsourcing firms for public contracts and are funneling millions of state taxpayer dollars offshore. Complete the following to send this message to your State's governor...

  • CNET News: Study: States doing plenty of offshoring. Excerpts: he study was prepared for WashTech by the Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First, an organization that aims to help grassroots groups and policy-makers ensure that economic development subsidies are accountable and effective. WashTech is a local affiliate of the Communications Workers of America union. In a conference call, a reporter noted that $75 million is a drop in the large bucket of state government spending. Philip Mattera, director of the Corporate Research Project, suggested the tally would be bigger if the study included state contract work sent overseas by U.S. tech services companies, such as IBM. "We're convinced that whatever the (total) quantity is, it's much greater than $75 million," he said. Marcus Courtney, president of Washtech, said government agencies lack information about the wages ultimately paid for state work. "State governments may be undercutting labor standards," he said.

  • McKinsey and Company: Offshoring: Is It a Win-Win Game? Excerpt: Many businesses have turned to offshoring as a way to boost profits while many politicians believe that the gain is made only at the unacceptable cost of American jobs. MGI's latest research and analysis offer a new perspective: offshoring is as beneficial to the U.S. as it is to the destination country, probably more so. The most obvious benefits of offshoring accrue to businesses and English-speaking destination countries. Lower wages in foreign countries translate into significant savings and, often, improved quality. A software developer in the U.S., for example, costs $60 an hour whereas one in India only costs $6 an hour. This and other benefits could translate to a net impact of a 50 percent increase in profits for American businesses. Destination countries see increased investment and job creation through offshoring. India, for example, gains in net benefit at least 33 cents for every dollar of spend offshored to its country.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have too much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." — Franklin D. Roosevelt
This site is designed to allow IBM Employees to communicate and share methods of protecting their rights through the establishment of an IBM Employees Labor Union. Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act states it is a violation for Employers to spy on union gatherings, or pretend to spy. For the purpose of the National Labor Relations Act, notice is given that this site and all of its content, messages, communications, or other content is considered to be a union gathering.