Join your fellow employees who are fighting for your benefits—Join the Alliance!
Retirees, vendors, contractors, temps, and active employees are all eligible to become members of the Alliance@IBM
"I am writing to let you know that IBM will adjust pensions this year for approximately 42,000 U. S. IBMers – those IBMers (or their surviving beneficiaries) who have been retired the longest, with the lowest pensions. This adjustment will increase pensions for about half of those who qualified for the last pension adjustment in 2001.
As you know, pension increases are not part of IBM's pension formulas. Following a periodic evaluation of pension levels, IBM determined that an adjustment to existing pensions was warranted at this time for a portion of the retiree population who retired before January 1, 1997. The change will increase IBM's pension liabilities by about $220 million.
The majority of those who qualify for an adjustment will begin receiving their adjusted pensions with their September pension checks.
This is the second time since 2000 that IBM has adjusted existing pension levels. Before 2001, IBM had not increased pension levels for existing retirees since 1990.
We will be working to finalize details as quickly as possible. If you qualify, you'll hear more directly from IBM toward the end of the summer."
Randy MacDonald
Remember when it cost about 25% more to insure your spouse? Now it costs 400% more. Those of us fortunate enough to still have the spouse who stood by while we worked all kinds of hours, are now required to pay a premium for this blessing. I guess I am just an old fashioned family man, not a business man.
We're getting ready to train people from India and Brazil that had never worked on some of our products, and whose command of English isn't that good.
Also those looking internally before being cut loose, all I can say is good luck. The IBM Job Search tool sucks. I looked at jobs and applied for about 25 during the 30 days notice I was given. The majority don't even reply to acknowledge getting your resume. I only got one interview that looked very positive and then despite three follow-up notes from me the hiring manager never got back me.
I suspect once you're tagged to be cut loose something pops in the system to tell managers not to hire you. IBM would rather cut loose people with lots of skills rather than transfer (or god forbid, retrain) you in another position.
You and I both know this is a disaster in the making. Guess who's fault it will be when the disaster hits - it won't be the execs who set the strategy for failure and it won't be the Indians - it will be YOUR backside on the hook. Been there, done that, got the t-shirt and got the pink-slip.
When the servers fall all over the floor and the user data can't be recovered because backups have failed for weeks, don't be surprised if the execs get their own special servers and special support based in the US, just like the special deskside support they now get.
Nobody at the executive levels in SO gives a rat's ass about quality of internal delivery and serving the internal clients. It's all about cutting costs, minimizing overhead, self-important power trips and maximizing the short term stock price. Nothing is more important than that *^%$!@ stock price.
If you also haven't figured out by now, the only people in SO that are getting promotions and pay increases are the execs and higher level management - the rest of us will continue to get what few crumbs that fall off the table after the executive's 15 course feast is done - that is if we keep our jobs. This will continue in SSO for as far as anyone can predict. It's probably the worst place to work in IBM today and is getting worse every day.
Does anyone know what the "official" IBM retirement plan document says about this income adjustment for disabled employees? How do I go about getting a copy of the current IBM retirement plan document for the old, defined benefit plan? Thanks a lot.
In 2004, IBM officials anticipated that the company’s Tulsa location, which had 1,200 employees at the time, could nearly double its Tulsa work force by adding up to 1,000 positions by 2009. When asked Tuesday if that was still the prediction for the company, Tieszen said he would have to check. He e-mailed later in the evening to say he didn’t expect to receive an answer so late in the day.
Selected reader comments from the Tulsa World article follow:
That's because the Democratic leadership, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, has given the Congressional Hispanic Caucus "veto power" over any immigration-related bill that comes to the House floor, regardless of its popularity, Fishman said at a panel discussion here hosted by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank that supports an increase in the H-1B cap.
Even IBM, the leader in the global services and outsourcing business, will ultimately feel the pressure. Gartner puts the worldwide market for IT services in 2007 at $748 billion. With $54 billion in services revenue, IBM had 7.2% of the market. At $22 billion, EDS had 3%, while H-P had 2.3%. ...
For IBM, the merger would create an aggressive, diversified competitor nearly on IBM's scale. IBM and EDS compete especially in the government sector. "There is now someone that is close to offering [IBM's] comprehensive offerings," Foster said.
IBM delivers enviable profit margins on its services businesses: Its global technology services took in $35.1 billion in 2007, or 7% growth in constant currency, and had a pretax profit margin of 9.4%. Its global business services grew 9% to $18 billion, delivering a margin of 10.7%.
Those figures are well beyond a reported profit margin of 6% for EDS, although the comparison is not "fair," Foster said. "IBM is selling higher-end consulting, application-customization services where the margins are very good."
The estimated $550 billion market for technology services has long been dominated by IBM Corp., which has about a 10 percent share. HP ranks a distant fifth with a 3 percent market share, based on its $16.6 billion in technology services revenue in its last fiscal year. HP has already surpassed IBM as the world's largest all-purpose technology company, based on revenue. ...
To wring more profit from the EDS takeover, HP indicated it will make significant layoffs as it eliminates overlapping jobs and cuts other expenses. Hurd and EDS CEO Ronald Rittenmeyer declined to estimate how many workers might lose their jobs. HP already has eliminated about 15,000 jobs since Hurd took control.
Opponents to the program argue that H-1B visas do none of the above, but are instead used by large, greedy tech companies to undercut the wages of U.S. workers, effectively pushing them out of jobs. Opponents cite fines levied against system abusers as evidence.
In an article published this month by the Center for Immigration Studies, a think tank favoring fewer immigrants but a warmer welcome for those admitted, Norman Matloff, a professor at the University of California, Davis, who has been a longtime critic of the H-1B program, took a look at the median salaries of H-1B visa workers in the U.S. and found that although these workers weren't being underpaid, the median salary for a tech worker on an H-1B is simply the prevailing wage for their job and no more.
From there, Matloff drew the conclusion that if these workers were truly the best and brightest and would be able to foster U.S. innovation, they'd be able to command salaries higher than the prevailing wage.
"Most foreign tech workers, particularly those from Asia, are in fact of only average talent. Moreover, they are hired for low-level jobs of limited responsibility, not positions that generate innovation. This is true both overall and in the key tech occupations, and most importantly, in the firms most stridently demanding that Congress admit more foreign workers," Matloff writes.
By the presale estimates for the big auctions of contemporary art this week, the market could fairly be characterized as rosy. Sotheby’s estimates it will raise a record $375 million to $477 million. Christie’s hopes for $280 million to $390 million, also a record. Both hope to sell paintings at prices once reserved for large corporate jets or small islands: Sotheby’s expects to get $70 million for a triptych by Francis Bacon, almost $20 million more than the record for the artist set last year.
Reassuring as it may be to see a least some consumer spending booming, the art world’s ever rising valuations are a symptom of a growing imbalance in the American economy: the unprecedented concentration of the spoils of growth at the very top. This is not a healthy thing for any country, especially one that eschewed royalty a long time ago.
To understand how large the gap has grown, consider 1993. Then, the richest 1 percent of families pocketed 14 percent of the nation’s income. By 2006, their slice had grown to 23 percent. If that seems extreme, consider that two years ago the 15,000 families in the top 0.01 percent of the population drew 5.5 percent of the nation’s total income, an even higher share than during the gilded age. ...
Age discrimination and bias, burnout and the pressure to keep skills current are all issues older technology workers face. Some workers contend companies prefer young, comparatively cheap talent to those with more experience.
With pain as his primary motivator, Lupo started researching his options online. He eventually found his way to WorldMed Assist, a 2-year-old Concord company that is part of a growing industry that makes arrangements for Americans to get medical care abroad.
Lupo's hip surgery and hospital stay cost $8,880 at Wockhardt Hospital in Bangalore. Even with the $1,300 airfare, the procedure totaled about a third of what it would have cost Lupo at a local hospital. ...
American physicians warn that patients who seek care overseas for complex procedures such as orthopedic surgeries may underestimate the potential for something to go wrong, both overseas and upon their return. "Everything is made in China now. It doesn't have to be that way for health care," said Dr. Robert Klapper, chief of orthopedic surgery at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles and spokesman for the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. "You take major risks when you go elsewhere."
HSAs "start off providing assistance to those who already can afford health care coverage period," said Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-Calif.). Becerra argued that HSAs provided "tax shelters" for the relatively small number of people who had maxed out their yearly savings in IRAs and 401(k)s, and that the program lacked sufficient oversight to guarantee that participants were spending the money on qualified health care expenses. ...
For healthy individuals who can afford to make large contributions, the benefits go beyond medical: after age 65 participants can withdraw income -- penalty-free -- and use it on non-medical expenses.
Money deposited into an HSA can be deposited pretax or claimed as an above-the-line deduction, earnings grow tax-free, and no taxes are taken out when funds are used for qualified medical expenses. Though younger people who withdraw funds for nonmedical expenses are subject to taxes and a 10% withdrawal penalty, people over 65 can use the money for other expenses, and it's taxed only as income.
Those looking to skirt the law and withdraw the money early for other uses, face very little risk of being caught: the only oversight to HSA spending is IRS audits, and fewer than 1% of taxpayers are audited every year.
"This is sounding more and more like a really good tax shelter if you happen to have a lot of money if you've maxed out on your [401(k) or IRA]," said Rep. Becerra. "It sounds to me like a Ponzi scheme here."
The Alliance has been losing members due to retirement, job loss and employee financial difficulties. This web site receives an average of 40,000 visitors a month.
Tough economic times are obvious; however, we simply can not go on or take employee advocacy to higher levels if we don't build our dues paying membership. It is not just this web site: It is an office and an organization that is at stake. Our staff of 1 full time, 1 part time and volunteers/members are dedicated to building this organization; but it is up to YOU to see that we are able to keep the office open and the organization financially viable. We need to become financially independent--We can not continue to rely on being financed by non-IBM CWA members. IBM employees need to support their own organization!
Frankly if IBM employees do not see the value of this employee organization then the future of our work is in jeopardy.
Please consider joining the Alliance@IBM as a member for only $10 a month--the cost of a few Starbuck's coffees. Your dues and involvement help the Alliance with the following:
We also have the expense of keeping an office up and running: Rent, Office supplies, fax, phones internet access and mailings of organizing materials; such as newsletters, flyers and brochures.
We believe Alliance@IBM has, by its very existence; given IBM Corporate Mgmt pause, during their anti-employee actions.
The bottom line is that if we are NOT here, then IBM Corporate Management has the field. There will be some who say that employees do not want representation through an employee organization or a union. Now is the time: Prove them wrong or prove them right.
Vault's IBM Business Consulting Services message board is a popular hangout for IBM BCS employees, including many employees acquired from PwC. Some sample posts follow:
IBM is not a good place to start or end a career - as most people on here would probably testify to. If it's your only start then view it as a stepping stone, but not an end in itself. The appraisal system is rigged (it simply is not objective enough and is designed to favor management). I am now convinced that HR's role in IBM is to break the independent spirit of an individual and then remake that person in an image of their own choosing. This creates a gullible employee who will stay with the company and put up with their dehumanizing processes until THEY are ready to dispose of them.
I have worked in industry and consulting. Industry still has good processes that are designed to produce favourable outcomes for the business. IBM's main concern is for it's people to be billable. Unfortunately, this creates a range of detrimental and counter-productive behaviours.
It isn't your manager's fault - it's the executives who are using this to drive costs down and stock price up. They don't care about employee morale, or investing in employee education or retaining talent and skills - all they want is to cut costs regardless of the effect upon the business. Here's the reality:
That's the frank reality.
What part of nothing don't you understand?
It isn't your manager's fault - it's the executives who are using this to drive costs down and stock price up. They don't care about employee morale, or investing in employee education or retaining talent and skills - all they want is to cut costs regardless of the effect upon the business. Here's the reality:
This site is designed to allow IBM Employees to communicate and share methods of protecting their rights through the establishment of an IBM Employees Labor Union. Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act states it is a violation for Employers to spy on union gatherings, or pretend to spy. For the purpose of the National Labor Relations Act, notice is given that this site and all of its content, messages, communications, or other content is considered to be a union gathering.