Welcome to IBM Employee News and Links

“News and links for IBM employees, retirees, ex-employees, and persons interested in pension, retirement, off-shoring and corporate governance issues”—The news you won't see on W3!

Our Friends:

Watching IBM Watching IBM Facebook

Quick Links:

Get involved! Insider trading After IBM Lenovo Employee Discount

Previous highlights:

April 2, 2016 March 26, 2016 March 12, 2016 March 5, 2016 February 27, 2016 February 20, 2016 February 13, 2016 February 6, 2016 January 30, 2016 January 16, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 19, 2015 December 12, 2015 December 5, 2015 November 28, 2015 November 21, 2015 November 14, 2015 November 7, 2015 October 31, 2015 October 24, 2015 October 17, 2015 October 10, 2015 October 3, 2015 September 26, 2015 September 19, 2015 September 12, 2015 August 29, 2015 August 22, 2015 August 15, 2015 August 8, 2015 July 25, 2015 July 25, 2015 July 18, 2015 July 4, 2015 June 27, 2015 June 20, 2015 June 13, 2015 June 6, 2015 May 30, 2015 May 23, 2015 May 16, 2015 May 9, 2015 May 2, 2015 April 25, 2015 April 18, 2015 April 11, 2015 April 4, 2015 March 28, 2015 March 21, 2015 March 14, 2015 March 7, 2015 February 28, 2015 February 21, 2015 February 14, 2015 February 7, 2015 January 31, 2015 January 24, 2015 January 17, 2015 January 10, 2015 January 3, 2015 December 27, 2014 December 20, 2014 December 13, 2014 December 6, 2014 November 29, 2014 November 22, 2014 November 15, 2014 November 8, 2014 November 1, 2014 October 25, 2014 October 18, 2014 October 11, 2014 October 4, 2014 September 27, 2014 September 13, 2014 September 6, 2014 August 30, 2014 August 23, 2014 August 16, 2014 August 9, 2014 August 2, 2014 July 26, 2014 July 19, 2014 July 12, 2014 July 5, 2014 June 28, 2014 June 21, 2014 June 14, 2014 June 7, 2014 May 31, 2014 May 24, 2014 May 17, 2014 May 10, 2014 May 3, 2014 April 26, 2014 April 19, 2014 April 12, 2014 April 5, 2014 March 29, 2014 March 22, 2014 March 15, 2014 March 8, 2014 March 1, 2014 February 22, 2014 February 15, 2014 February 8, 2014 February 1, 2014 January 25, 2014 January 18, 2014 January 11, 2014 January 4, 2014 December 28, 2013 December 21, 2013 December 14, 2013 December 7, 2013 November 30, 2013 November 23, 2013 November 16, 2013 November 9, 2013 November 2, 2013 October 26, 2013 October 19, 2013 October 12, 2013 October 5, 2013 September 28, 2013 September 21, 2013 September 14, 2013 September 7, 2013 August 31, 2013 August 24, 2013 August 17, 2013 August 10, 2013 August 3, 2013 July 27, 2013 July 20, 2013 July 13, 2013 July 6, 2013 June 29, 2013 June 22, 2013 June 15, 2013 June 8, 2013 June 1, 2013 May 25, 2013 May 18, 2013 May 11, 2013 May 4, 2013 April 27, 2013 April 20, 2013 April 13, 2013 April 6, 2013 March 30, 2013 March 23, 2013 March 16, 2013 March 9, 2013 March 2, 2013 February 23, 2013 February 16, 2013 February 9, 2013 February 2, 2013 January 26, 2013 January 19, 2013 January 12, 2013 January 5, 2013 December 29, 2012 December 22, 2012 December 15, 2012 December 8, 2012 December 1, 2012 November 24, 2012 November 17, 2012 November 10, 2012 November 3, 2012 October 27, 2012 October 20, 2012 October 13, 2012 October 6, 2012 September 29, 2012 September 22, 2012 September 15, 2012 September 8, 2012 September 1, 2012 August 25, 2012 August 18, 2012 August 11, 2012 August 4, 2012 July 28, 2012 July 21, 2012 July 14, 2012 July 7, 2012 June 30, 2012 June 23, 2012 June 16, 2012 June 9, 2012 June 2, 2012 May 26, 2012 May 19, 2012 May 12, 2012 May 5, 2012 April 28, 2012 April 21, 2012 April 14, 2012 April 7, 2012 March 31, 2012 March 24, 2012 March 17, 2012 March 10, 2012 March 3, 2012 February 25, 2012 February 18, 2012 February 11, 2012 February 4, 2012 January 28, 2012 January 21, 2012 January 14, 2012 January 7, 2012 December 31, 2011 December 24, 2011 December 17, 2011 December 10, 2011 December 3, 2011 November 26, 2011 November 19, 2011 November 12, 2011 November 5, 2011 October 29, 2011 October 22, 2011 October 15, 2011 October 8, 2011 October 1, 2011 September 24, 2011 September 17, 2011 September 10, 2011 September 3, 2011 August 27, 2011 August 20, 2011 August 13, 2011 August 6, 2011 July 30, 2011 July 23, 2011 July 16, 2011 July 9, 2011 July 2, 2011 June 25, 2011 June 18, 2011 June 11, 2011 June 4, 2011 May 28, 2011 May 21, 2011 May 14, 2011 May 7, 2011 April 30, 2011 April 23, 2011 April 16, 2011 April 9, 2011 April 2, 2011 March 26, 2011 March 19, 2011 March 12, 2011 March 5, 2011 February 26, 2011 February 19, 2011 February 12, 2011 February 5, 2011 January 29, 2011 January 22, 2011 January 15, 2011 January 8, 2011 January 1, 2011 December 25, 2010 December 18, 2010 December 11, 2010 December 4, 2010 November 27, 2010 November 20, 2010 November 13, 2010 November 6, 2010 October 30, 2010 October 23, 2010 October 16, 2010 October 9, 2010 October 2, 2010 September 25, 2010 September 18, 2010 September 11, 2010 September 4, 2010 August 28, 2010 August 21, 2010 August 14, 2010 August 7, 2010 July 31, 2010 July 24, 2010 July 17, 2010 July 10, 2010 July 3, 2010 June 26, 2010 June 19, 2010 June 12, 2010 June 5, 2010 May 29, 2010 May 22, 2010 May 15, 2010 May 8, 2010 May 1, 2010 April 24, 2010 April 17, 2010 April 10, 2010 April 3, 2010 March 27, 2010 March 20, 2010 March 13, 2010 March 6, 2010 February 27, 2010 February 20, 2010 February 13, 2010 February 6, 2010 January 30, 2010 January 23, 2010 January 16, 2010 January 9, 2010 January 2, 2010 December 26, 2009 December 19, 2009 December 12, 2009 December 5, 2009 November 28, 2009 November 21, 2009 November 14, 2009 November 7, 2009 October 31, 2009 October 24, 2009 October 17, 2009 October 10, 2009 October 3, 2009 September 26, 2009 September 19, 2009 September 12, 2009 September 5, 2009 August 29, 2009 August 22, 2009 August 15, 2009 August 8, 2009 August 1, 2009 July 25, 2009 July 18, 2009 July 11, 2009 July 4, 2009 June 27, 2009 June 20, 2009 June 13, 2009 June 6, 2009 May 30, 2009 May 23, 2009 May 16, 2009 May 9, 2009 May 2, 2009 April 25, 2009 April 18, 2009 April 11, 2009 April 4, 2009 March 28, 2009 March 21, 2009 March 14, 2009 March 7, 2009 February 28, 2009 February 21, 2009 February 14, 2009 February 7, 2009 January 31, 2009 January 24, 2009 January 17, 2009 January 10, 2009 January 03, 2009 December 27, 2008 December 20, 2008 December 13, 2008 December 6, 2008 November 29, 2008 November 22, 2008 November 15, 2008 November 8, 2008 November 1, 2008 October 25, 2008 October 18, 2008 October 11, 2008 October 4, 2008 September 27, 2008 September 20, 2008 September 13, 2008 September 6, 2008 August 30, 2008 August 23, 2008 August 16, 2008 August 9, 2008 August 2, 2008 July 26, 2008 July 19, 2008 July 12, 2008 July 5, 2008 June 28, 2008 June 21, 2008 June 14, 2008 June 7, 2008 May 31, 2008 May 24, 2008 May 17, 2008 May 10, 2008 2008 Stock Meeting April 26, 2008 April 19, 2008 April 12, 2008 April 5, 2008 March 29, 2008 March 22, 2008 March 15, 2008 March 8, 2008 March 1, 2008 February 16, 2008 February 9, 2008 February 2, 2008 January 26, 2008 January 19, 2008 January 12, 2008 January 5, 2008 December 29, 2007 December 22, 2007 December 15, 2007 December 8, 2007 December 1, 2007 November 24, 2007 November 17, 2007 November 10, 2007 November 3, 2007 October 27, 2007 October 20, 2007 October 13, 2007 October 6, 2007 September 29, 2007 September 22, 2007 September 15, 2007 September 8, 2007 September 1, 2007 August 25, 2007 August 18, 2007 August 11, 2007 August 4, 2007 July 28, 2007 July 21, 2007 July 14, 2007 July 7, 2007 June 30, 2007 June 23, 2007 June 16, 2007 June 9, 2007 June 2, 2007 May 26, 2007 May 19, 2007 May 12, 2007 May 5, 2007 2007 Stock Meeting April 21, 2007 April 14, 2007 April 7, 2007 March 31, 2007 March 24, 2007 March 17, 2007 March 10, 2007 March 3, 2007 February 24, 2007 February 17, 2007 February 10, 2007 February 3, 2007 January 27, 2007 January 20, 2007 January 13, 2007 January 6, 2007 December 30, 2006 December 23, 2006 December 16, 2006 December 9, 2006 December 2, 2006 November 25, 2006 November 18, 2006 November 11, 2006 November 4, 2006 October 28, 2006 October 21, 2006 October 14, 2006 October 7, 2006 September 30, 2006 September 23, 2006 September 16, 2006 September 9, 2006 September 2, 2006 August 26, 2006 August 19, 2006 August 12, 2006 August 5, 2006 July 29, 2006 July 22, 2006 July 15, 2006 July 8, 2006 July 1, 2006 June 24, 2006 June 17, 2006 June 10, 2006 June 3, 2006 May 27, 2006 May 20, 2006 May 13, 2006 May 6, 2006 2006 Stock Meeting April 22, 2006 April 15, 2006 April 8, 2006 April 1, 2006 March 25, 2006 March 18, 2006 March 11, 2006 March 4, 2006 February 25, 2006 February 18, 2006 February 11, 2006 February 4, 2006 January 28, 2006 January 21, 2006 January 14, 2006 January 7, 2006 December 31, 2005 December 24, 2005 December 17, 2005 December 10, 2005 December 03, 2005 November 26, 2005 November 19, 2005 November 12, 2005 November 5, 2005 October 29, 2005 October 22, 2005 October 15, 2005 October 8, 2005 October 1, 2005 September 24, 2005 September 17, 2005 September 10, 2005 September 3, 2005 August 27, 2005 August 20, 2005 August 13, 2005 August 6, 2005 July 30, 2005 July 23, 2005 July 16, 2005 July 9, 2005 July 2, 2005 June 25, 2005 June 18, 2005 June 11, 2005 June 4, 2005 May 28, 2005 May 21, 2005 May 14, 2005 May 7, 2005 April 30, 2005 April 23, 2005 April 16, 2005 April 9, 2005 April 2, 2005 March 26, 2005 March 19, 2005 March 12, 2005 March 5, 2005 February 26, 2005 February 19, 2005 February 12, 2005 February 5, 2005 January 29, 2005 January 22, 2005 January 15, 2005 January 8, 2005 January 1, 2005 December 25, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 11, 2004 December 4, 2004 November 27, 2004 November 20, 2004 November 13, 2004 November 6, 2004 October 30, 2004 October 23, 2004 October 16, 2004 October 9, 2004 October 2, 2004 September 25, 2004 September 18, 2004 September 11, 2004 September 4, 2004 August 28, 2004 August 21, 2004 August 14, 2004 August 7, 2004 July 31, 2004 July 24, 2004 July 17, 2004 July 10, 2004 July 3, 2004 June 26, 2004 June 19, 2004 June 5, 2004 May 29, 2004 May 22, 2004 May 15, 2004 May 8, 2004 2004 Stock Meeting April 24, 2004 April 10, 2004 April 3, 2004 March 27, 2004 March 20, 2004 March 13, 2004 March 6, 2004 February 28, 2004 February 21, 2004 February 14, 2004 February 7, 2004 February 1, 2004 January 18, 2004 December 27, 2003 December 20, 2003 December 13, 2003 December 6, 2003 November 29, 2003 November 22, 2003 November 15, 2003 November 8, 2003 November 1, 2003 October 25, 2003 October 18, 2003 October 11, 2003 October 4, 2003 September 27, 2003 September 20, 2003 September 13, 2003 September 6, 2003 August 30, 2003 August 23, 2003 August 16, 2003 August 9, 2003 Pension Lawsuit Win July 26, 2003 July 19, 2003 July 12, 2003 July 5, 2003 June 28, 2003 June 21, 2003 June 14, 2003 June 7, 2003 May 31, 2003 May 24, 2003 May 17, 2003 May 10, 2003 2003 Stock Meeting April 26, 2003 April 19, 2003 April 12, 2003 April 5, 2003 March 29, 2003 March 22, 2003 March 15, 2003 March 8, 2003 March 1, 2003 February 22, 2003 February 15, 2003 February 8, 2003 February 1, 2003 January 25, 2003 January 18, 2003 January 11, 2003 January 4, 2003 December 28, 2002 December 21, 2002 December 14, 2002 December 7, 2002 November 30, 2002 November 23, 2002 November 16, 2002 November 9, 2002 November 2, 2002 October 26, 2002 October 19, 2002 October 12, 2002 October 5, 2002 September 28, 2002 September 21, 2002 September 14, 2002 September 7, 2002 August 31, 2002 August 24, 2002 August 17, 2002 August 10, 2002 August 3, 2002 July 27, 2002 July 20, 2002 July 13, 2002 July 6, 2002 June 29, 2002 June 22, 2002 June 15, 2002 June 8, 2002 June 1, 2002 May 25, 2002 May 18, 2002 May 11, 2002 2002 Stock Meeting April 27, 2002 April 20, 2002 April 13, 2002 April 6, 2002 March 30, 2002 March 23, 2002 March 16, 2002 March 9, 2002 March 2, 2002 February 23, 2002 February 16, 2002 February 9, 2002 February 2, 2002 January 26, 2002 January 19, 2002 January 12, 2002 January 5, 2002 December 29, 2001 December 22, 2001 December 15, 2001 December 8, 2001 December 1, 2001 November 24, 2001 November 17, 2001 November 10, 2001 November 3, 2001 October 27, 2001 October 20, 2001 October 13, 2001 October 6, 2001 September 29, 2001 September 22, 2001 September 15, 2001 September 8, 2001 September 1, 2001 August 25, 2001 August 18, 2001 August 11, 2001 August 4, 2001 July 28, 2001 July 21, 2001 July 14, 2001 July 7, 2001 June 30, 2001 June 23, 2001 June 16, 2001 June 9, 2001 June 2, 2001 May 26, 2001 May 19, 2001 May 12, 2001 May 5, 2001 2001 Stock Meeting April 21, 2001 April 14, 2001 April 7, 2001 March 31, 2001 March 24, 2001 March 17, 2001 March 10, 2001 March 3, 2001 February 24, 2001 February 17, 2001 February 10, 2001 February 3, 2001 January 27, 2001 January 20, 2001 January 13, 2001 January 6, 2001 December 30, 2000 December 23, 2000 December 16, 2000 December 9, 2000 December 2, 2000 November 24, 2000 November 17, 2000 November 10, 2000 November 4, 2000 October 28, 2000 October 21, 2000 October 14, 2000 October 7, 2000 September 30, 2000 September 23, 2000 September 16, 2000 September 9, 2000 September 2, 2000 August 26, 2000 August 19, 2000 August 12, 2000 July 29, 2000 July 22, 2000 July 15, 2000 July 1, 2000 June 24, 2000 June 17, 2000 June 10, 2000 June 3, 2000 May 27, 2000 May 20, 2000 May 13, 2000 May 6, 2000 April, 2000

Highlights—October 27, 2012

  • Yahoo! IBM Employee Issues message board: "eblast sent to Alliance e list" by Lee Conrad, President, Alliance@IBM. Full excerpt: In our previous communication we told you about what is happening to IBM's Xcel Energy account workers and the threat to their jobs. On our web site www.allianceibm.org we have "voices from employees" that report on working conditions in Application Hosting Services. We also have a section just for GDF workers.

    Workers in AMS (Application Management Services) have asked the Alliance to inform their IBM co-workers what the situation in their group is like. This is their report.

    "On December 1st/2nd, AMS North America will be holding a Mandatory Quality and Innovation Summit. What irritates AMS workers is that not only is this mandatory and on a weekend, but typical of working in AMS the workers will not get any comp time while the work load continues to get piled on.

    This summit is mandatory because workers typically want some time off for Thanksgiving or Christmas/New Years. This is just to drive more 4th quarter revenue. We were also told to do this in June. Employees are given high utilization targets for each quarter. Essentially we are expected to work off normal paid time off, such as vacation and holidays, through extra overtime during other weeks. So essentially we get no real relief from the grind.

    For example, in October workers are being told we have to work 220 billable hours for the month. October is a five week month in IBM's AMS calender, so normal work week and month would be 40 hours per week=200 hours expected to be billed. That would be 100% utilization. But management has said that for October we have to have 220 hours or 110% utilization which is a mandatory 44 hours per week.

    Most older employees with long tenure at IBM have 4 or 5 weeks of vacation per year by company policy but the reality is most of us rarely take half that as we are threatened by a lower PBC (and an RA) if our utilization falls below 100%.

    100% means that anytime off during the year for vacation. holidays, family illness or death, and sick time is made up hour by hour in the weeks we are at working through additional overtime.

    So essentially we do not get any time off. Sad state of affairs when workers are driven like slaves, jeopardize their health and can't have quality time with their families.

    When the June 9th edict came out there were dozens of Speakups/Open Doors from AMS workers, but the higher ups just basically ignored them because legally there is nothing barring them from doing this for exempt professional employees, and as we all know IBM has no ethical conscience regarding worker morale or respect for the individual.

    We need to shine a light on what IBM workers are going through. An AMS worker."

    The Alliance knows there are similar stories in every IBM work group. But as an employee advocate we need your help in changing things for the better with a negotiated contract for employees.

    Please join the Alliance at www.allianceibm.org. Membership is confidential.

    Help us turn things around for IBM workers. Help us bring dignity, respect and decent working conditions back into IBM.

    Executives have contracts--YOU should too! The Alliance@IBM team.

  • I, Cringely: Don’t mess with IBM: one downside of suing a tech company that thinks like a law firm. By Bob Cringely. Excerpts: I struck a chord with my recent column on H-1B visa abuse, so I’ll be following later today with an enormous post that tries to explain the underlying issues. But before then here’s something I came across that doesn’t quite fit that theme but was too interesting to let pass unnoticed — how companies like IBM intimidate employees and discourage them from speaking up.

    A few years ago there was a class action lawsuit against IBM. Thirty-two thousand server administrators were being forced to work overtime without extra pay. IBM lost the suit and paid a $65 million settlement. That’s just over $2000 per affected employee before the lawyers took their share. Then IBM gave all those workers a 15 percent pay cut with the justification they’d get it back in their overtime pay. Next IBM restricted the workers to 40 hour weeks so there would be no overtime.

    VP approval was required each time someone was needed to work overtime. The net result was all the server admins worked exactly 40 hours a week and for 15 percent less pay. I’m told by some of those IBMers involved that they were then put at the top of the layoff list. At the end of their severance pay period after being laid off many were rehired as contractors — for less money and no benefits. At that point they were at 50-60 percent of their original pay. Eventually most of those jobs were shipped overseas.

    Selected reader comments follow:

    • John says: I see this as a power asymmetry pure and simple. When these kind of practices happened in the 19th century, workers formed trade unions — which the governmental authorities opposed and suppressed. We are living in a similar time. Without unions large operations will always be looking to cut costs at the worker’s expense and that is what you just described. I’m all for competition in the marketplace for labor, but you have to draw a line at some point and be willing to make a stand. Unfortunately high tech workers haven’t realized this yet.
    • BS says: I don’t think its a matter of whether they realize it or not. But, its hard to get any leverage when scabs live 10,000 miles away and will work for ten cents on the dollar.
    • Joe Latrell says: This is what happens when you stop referring to an employee as an employee – instead they are a resource. Once you stop thinking about your people, you can discard them just as you would toss a newspaper into the trash. It is people who will ultimately save the company bacon when the chips are down. They are often the first thing to get cut when trouble hits and that is the DUMBEST thing a company can do.

      Making enemies of your employees wins you no favors either.

      But then we sit and take it. No one will stand up for fear of losing what they have. Everyone complains but no one acts. If everyone in the US did what they do in France (i.e. have a work stoppage) it might finally get the big boy’s attention. If that is a good thing or not, who knows. I do see it as better than what we have now.

    • Former IBM Employee says: This situation is certainly disturbing on many levels, but to any long-time IBM employee it should not be a surprise.

      I worked in division 07 (strategic outsourcing) at the time all this was happening. The fact of the matter was that as far as management was concerned, the employees cost too much. They cost too much when compared to foreign labor, and they proved themselves (via the lawsuit) to be a legal liability as well.

      IBM management was determined to limit both the financial and legal exposure, and so they did it…end of story.

      Ugly? Yes, but not as ugly as it might have been. Disrespectful? Ethically questionable? I would say yes on both counts.

      Let it be a cautionary tale to anyone who might consider working for the company. The paychecks don’t bounce (for now), but don’t expect it to be easy or long-lasting. Don’t make any commitments to them, because they sure as hell aren’t going to make any commitments to you.

    • LeftBigBlue says: I went to work for IBM directly after graduating college in 2001. I was there for 11 years, and I left voluntarily in January 2012 to go work for another organization. In my 11 years at IBM, I experienced firsthand the rot and decay of that company’s work environment and culture. I was a high-performing employee there who received high performance reviews and was highly compensated, but it got to the point where I could not stomach the thought of another day of my life wasted working for that company. It’s a company that no longer has a soul.

      The last 10 months at my new employer have been, by far, the best months of my career and my life.

      My plea is for everyone to stop buying IBM products until such time that they start treating their employees like real human beings.

    • Abrade_Gavel says: IBM loves it’s contractors. The Boulder CO location is largely staffed by contractors. However, some of its GBS Federal locations require that employees be IBMers in order for them to count toward the required head count. IBMs solution to that is LTS or long term supplemental employees. This allows IBM to save money by reducing the benefits that an LTS is entitled to. Keep them in very low “bands” and you have a perfect cheap employee that meets the feds requirements.
  • I, Cringely: What Americans don’t know about H-1B visas could hurt us all. By Bob Cringely. Excerpts: The H-1B visa program was created in 1990 to allow companies to bring skilled technical workers into the USA. It’s a non-immigrant visa and so has nothing at all to do with staying in the USA, becoming a citizen, or starting a business. Big tech employers are constantly lobbying for increases in H-1B quotas citing their inability to find qualified U.S. job applicants. Bill Gates and other leaders from the IT industry have testified about this before Congress. Both major political parties embrace the H-1B program with varying levels of enthusiasm. But Bill Gates is wrong. What he said to Congress may have been right for Microsoft but was wrong for America and can only lead to lower wages, lower employment, and a lower standard of living. This is a bigger deal than people understand: it’s the rebirth of industrial labor relations circa 1920. Our ignorance about the H-1B visa program is being used to unfairly limit wages and steal — yes, steal — jobs from U.S. citizens.

    There are a number of common misunderstandings about the H-1B program, the first of which is its size. H-1B quotas are set by Congress and vary from 65,000 to 190,000 per year. While that would seem to limit the impact of the program on a nation of 300+ million, H-1B is way bigger than you think because each visa lasts for three years and can be extended for another three years after that.

    At any moment, then, there are about 700,000 H-1B visa holders working in the USA.

    Most of these H-1B visa holders work in Information Technology (IT) and most of those come from India. There are about 500,000 IT workers in the USA holding H-1B visas. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, there are about 2.5 million IT workers in America. So approximately 20 percent of the domestic IT workforce isn’t domestic at all, but imported on H-1B visas. Keep this in mind as we move forward. ...

    There is a misconception about the H-1B program that it was designed to allow companies to import workers with unique talents. There has long been a visa program for exactly that purpose. The O (for outstanding) visa program is for importing geniuses and nothing else. Interestingly enough, the O visa program has no quotas. So when Bill Gates complained about not being able to import enough top technical people for Microsoft, he wasn’t talking about geniuses, just normal coders. ...

    The whole labor shortage argument is total hogwash. Yes, there is a labor shortage at substandard wages. ...

    It’s not hard to suppose from this information that an influx of H-1B workers representing an average 20 percent of the local technical work force (those 500,000 H-1Bs against a 2.5 million body labor pool) would push down local wages.

    Selected reader comments follow:

    • AMusingFool says: Just one more data point: H-1B visas are also a hair away from indentured servitude for the workers. They have zero leverage for salary negotiations and such, because the visa program requires continuous employment. As in, not one day unemployed. So it’s nearly impossible to leave a job, to find another sponsor.
    • Robert X. Cringely says: Good point. It’s not the workers who are abusing this system but the employers who hire them. Think for a moment about the seven percent of H-1B employees for whom no wages at all are reported. That doesn’t happen at such a high level by accident. Those folks are probably being paid WAY below any prevailing wage. Heck they could be paid minimum wage for all we know. It makes me feel for the workers and also question the quality of their work under such terms.
    • Steve Smith says: I refer to the H1B visas as the “indentured servant” visa. Short, punchy, and makes the point.
    • Jerry says: “These abuses by corporations are not only hurting USA workers, they are hurting our nation.” And the multinationals couldn’t care less. That is why they lobby for laws that give themselves power to sue governments. They’ll take what they can and damn the ones who get in their way. Kind of like the mafia, but in a bigger way.
    • dg says: Bob is spot on, and its sad that this issue doesn’t have more political visibility. In the last few years I’ve hired dozens of programmers+DBAs+testers after receiving many hundreds (thousands?) of resumes. These days the vast majority of resumes I read are from H1Bs and other non-citizens, filtered for me by the HR department primarily on low wages. The other scam I often see reading resumes is recent graduates from public universities who are non-citizens already with the same degree from their native country. Our public university seats are a scarce valuable resource that is being sold out. For every non-citizen student, a citizen is denied the opportunity to graduate with a degree. And non-citizens who already have foreign degrees easily dominate the top academic rankings, unfairly competing with citizen students.
    • netmouser says: H-1B holders displace so many US workers. Our country does not need 2 million new foreign workers every year (roughly 1 million illegal, 1 million legal), especially when the unemployment in the US is so high, especially in IT. the solution is to go back to the intent of the H-1B law, and limit its use to highly specialized skills that Americans cannot be found for. Heck, there is not even a requirement to first consider Americans for any job. It is the abuse of this intent that is the sticking point.
    • netmouser says:No, Marcel. Americans are almost completely absent from such education programs like engineering and IT because students saw what happened to their parents and plan for careers where they can be employed at graduation. They do not want to spend years and pay many thousands to end up without a job because the discipline is offshored or companies prefer cheap foreign imports under the H-1B program. The H-1B program’s jobs will never become equal (market) pay (like for legal residents) because companies want to keep the cheap indentured labor, and companies control Congress and laws. You know what happens to H-1Bs who get a green card? Many end up like legal residents and Americans without a job and complain about the H-1B visa.
    • JimJ says: IBM is far from the worst abuser. Silicon Valley may well have a tight enough labor market that many have your experience, but isn’t typical. If you exclude University professors, every H1-B I’ve gotten to know well enough to judge has been severely underpaid for the job. (Though not always for the performance, in cases where a dozen or more were rented out at once, and neither the renter nor the official employer had any incentive to care which of the twelve were competent.) And every one of them has looked forward to (or at least wished for) NOT being indentured to their current employer, either by returning to India with US experience under their belt, or by getting around the indentured portion of their current visa.
    • Rob says: Heh, you haven’t visited IBM Boulder. I’d say there are at least 500 there alone.
    • Finkster says: Bob, very nice article! I work in the Midwest and the infusion of H1B workers is huge. Not only are wages in the Midwest much lower than the coasts, but so is the general cost of living. Consulting billing rates (not what consultants are paid) can be as low as the 40′s. How can a single income family compete with such low wages? A union janitor can earn more than a skilled IT worker (in some cases).

      You also fail to mention many of these H1B workers send a good portion of their earning to their families back home. So they don’t fully contribute to the local economy. Wages earned in the USA end up supporting the India communities. So this end up being a double whammy.

      These H1B workers are fucking up the system and making it much harder on the families of U.S. citizens. I am happy you are bringing out this dirty secret of the IT industry.

    • Marcel says: Why is it always so much easier to scapegoat the people who are being exploited (if that is the case), rather than blaming the companies that are actually breaking the law and screwing both sides? As to H1Bs not contributing: as an H1B you pay full taxes, social security and unemployment insurance. By law, you can never collect on any of that, because you have to leave the country if you lose your job.
    • netmouser says: Same complaint as the illegals. The truth is, the H-1Bs I met – and many – live in groups in cheap apartments and receive a subsistence allowance to live on, receiving low pay back in their home country. Not paying the taxes we pay nor getting the same benefits.
    • Tim Johnson says: This article is 100% dead on. I have been in this field for 25 years and started out what was at that time this country’s most prestigious research facility. That being said its all gone today. H1Bs are all about cheap labor and driving down wages. Sure there is the occasional anomaly where that isn't so like the German national saying how its not true. Those of us in field know the truth though – its always about the $. The IT space today is totally dominated by the H1B. Go into any good sized company and go into the IT department and let me know what you see? I would put money on it that you see mostly young, foreign, male nationals on H1B. Based on my experiences with theme I would hardly say these people are the “best and brightest”. The media and corporations would love you to believe how did we ever get along without these people.

      I will tell you – they used to hire Americans. Not anymore. That is why just about every company you go to is H1B land now. I work in a large pharma as a contractor and I am only one of 17 Americans and there are 168 H1Bs. So what happened to all the other Americans. They have been shown the door, that's what. Laid off, had to train their replacement and than shown the door.

      I can also tell you this, when the first H1Bs arrived they told us all that we have to move up the value chain to being architects, PMs, BAs, etc… Well guess what? The H1Bs have moved up the value chain as well. I regularly encounter H1B PMs, architects and more. What's more is they now own space. Good luck getting hired.

      There is NOTHING that says America has to have an open door policy of providing jobs for foreign nationals when there is high unemployment in this country. Further more I would say that anyone that believes this is a traitor to this country.

      People have forgotten the past and why unions where originally formed. Go read your history books and read what corporations will do when there is no counterweight to them where they can do whatever they want to the population.

    • netmouser says:And as kids see what happened to their parents, they no longer choose to spend many years and thousands of dollars with big student loans on the IT and engineering programs in college, but instead choose a career where they will likely get a job on graduation. This is a highly serious security, as well as economic, issue for our country’s future.

      You are so right. My last client position for IBM, the team management level on-site was from IBM India, and the development team was in IBM India. Training was for new SAP applications, but I could not get approval for inclusion which was mainly for the foreign workers. That level of Americans there were part of IBM’s layoffs. Rumor was that project management was next to be staffed by foreigners. Executives from a prior contract were now at other company headquarters helping them transition to do the same – move their IT teams to foreigners.

    • Dan says: Thank you, thank you, thank you! This has been going on for so many years. The difference is the wage and not the qualifications. I constantly see contract positions filled by H1Bs at crazy low rates where another US candidate with better qualifications will be turned down. I know because I’ve been involved with the contract hiring process for many years. Many times the US candidate isn’t even interviewed because their rate is higher than a H1Bs rate. What happens? The US candidate is unemployed or is forced to reduce their rate.
    • Tim Johnson says: Who in their right mind would go into IT today? For what to compete with foreigners on visas in your own country for work? Are you kidding me? I want to see another industrialized country that's selling out its middle class on the alter of globalization.

      Does everyone remember them saying in the 80s and 90s that these jobs were the future of America? That if you were a computer person you would be employed for the rest of your life. Times have sure changed haven't they?

      They keep whining that there is a shortage of IT people. My question is where is there a shortage?

      Lets think about this in simple economics – the law of supply and demand which dictates if something is in high demand it commands higher prices, if its in lower demand it commands lower prices. This is all the free market wisdom that is constantly shove down everyone’s throat.

      So if there is a shortage than where is the money? I am not seeing it because IT salaries have been stagnant since the dot com and in fact have declined if you factor in inflation. We make less now than 10 years ago.

      So lets think about this – how can salaries possibly be lower if there is such a “shortage”???

      I will tell you how – there is no shortage. The H1Bs have GLUTTED the IT job market. Companies regularly receive 100+ resumes for ANY IT job that is posted. The bodyshops shovel in as many resumes as they will let them submit.

      And its not just the H1Bs there is a plethora of other visas that are being used ILLEGALLY by companies so they can bring in even more people. Realize these people are the equivalent of scabs that are used to break the backs of the unions back in the day only they are being used to break the backs of the middle class.

      Welcome to the future. Get a backbone because in the future any white collar job that can be offshored or done by foreigners on visas YOU will be replaced.

    • Will says: Bob: I love your column and your insights… However, your outright denunciation of H1Bs has my dander up… I came to the US 10 years ago, brought in from Canada on a TN then H1B VISA to head up a new department at a US company. I was (and hopefully still am) considered skilled, and was paid a very competitive (& prevailing) wage, at par with my peers. My department did well, and we eventually directly employed 35 people, with about 70 people employed in other parts of the business because of what my group built. Since then, I’ve gone on to a green card, and founded a startup now employing 30 people – all US citizens!

      My point is that there appear to be abusers of the system, and they should be dealt with very harshly. However, we must be very careful not to destroy or undermine the original intent – to enable the import of great talent that can help build and grow our economy. America was founded by immigrants and built by immigrants and their descendants. Anyone doing anything illegal should be punished. But lets not close the doors entirely and become totally xenophobic.

    • Robert X. Cringely says: I don’t denounce the H-1B program, I denounce how it is managed. Any visa program where 21 percent of participants are found to hold their papers fraudulently is being mismanaged. As I described, H-1B is being gamed by employers. That could easily be stopped in any number of ways. But unless someone like me speaks up it won’t happen. How would YOU suggest the program be improved?
    • IPv6 says: I work for a European multinational with an sizable office in Silicon Valley and in my group of twelve, ten are on H1Bs. None of them are doing a job that an American couldn’t do. I have personally interviewed 15+ applicants and most of the US based folks were good, if not better in most cases. I can only speak for my group but ALL are on the track for naturalization after the H1B runs out. Also its a myth the Americans don’t want to do engineering disciplines. Most if not all American universities will prefer a foreign student over an American as the foreign students are paying full price which equals more profits for the Uni
  • Forbes: Will IBM's Bet On A Realigned Jobs Market Be Its Undoing? By Haydn Shaughnessy. Excerpts: In The Elastic Enterprise, Nick Vitalari and I described how companies are evolving new ways to externalize their processes. IBM’s Liquid Challenge is, similarly, a way to take jobs out of the company into the global talent pool.

    “Liquid” has taken flak. IBM began implementation in Germany, where its liquid workforce policy emerged in the context of large job cuts, according to Handelsblatt, a German economic newspaper. Der Spiegel thought it was a way to end permanent employment. It’s also come under attack from employees who see it as IBM doing cheap outsourcing. ...

    In essence, the Liquid Challenge, is about breaking software design and development down into tasks that can be assigned on an open markets basis – and as usual that means you get paid for those parts of your work that are accepted.

    There seems to be a broader strategy, though, at IBM to introduce a more liquid, or what we would call, elastic, labor policy and the Liquid Challenge is an instance of this.

    I have a suspicion of IBM’s business thinking – based on watching them pour hundreds of millions of dollars into Second Life and in their efforts in social business. Put bluntly, IBM will try to bully its way to a new category because the company’s executives are so fearful of being the one to miss “the next PC thing”.

    But in the labor market, IBM have got it right. There is no reason for a professional services firm to have over 400,000 hires on the books. The logic of the elastic enterprise says that many of these roles are better performed by people who have the most up-to-date skills, and the odds on those being found inside the organization are, at best, evens.

  • The Register (United Kingdom): IBM slices UK GTS contractor rates. Ninety per cent of something or a hundred per cent of nothing. By Brid-Aine Parnell. Excerpts: IT contractors working for IBM Global Technology Services (GTS) in the UK are being hit with a 10 per cent rate cut from this week. A Reg reader said that IT bods were being told that they had to accept the rate reduction from this weekend.

    Selected reader comments follow:

    • Agencies? Which rates? What they pay their subcontractors? No, they are negotiated short term or are on a W2 basis. (I'm a yank so I'm using Yank terms... sorry) Rates they charge? Yes, they charge what markets will bare and then get beat up when the rates go down on their next contracted SOW. IBM? IBM is getting hammered by their customers. *SHOCKING*. This happens when you start to compete on price and not value. IBM gets less so they are now forced to squeeze the sub contractors who do all of the actual work. Pretty soon, the subs will walk.
    • Except that you have to pay for everything in IBM - no freebie drinks here.
    • Indeed (having served my time with IBM). However on £425 a day the most expensive part of a cup of IBM coffee is the cost of the time it takes to walk to the machine (or cafeteria) and back again. I did once suggest to my IBM boss that it would save them money if they employed a "waiter" to serve coffee to the "subbies" at their desks, rather than having the contractors fetch it themselves. Surprisingly, this was not well received!
    • I know.... Where I work, we have to sort our rubbish into recycling bins at the end of our row of desks rather than putting it into a bin next to us. I often wonder how much productivity is wasted by us having to get up, walk to the bin, decide which bin to throw which bit of rubbish into. We must be the highest paid rubbish sorters in the world!
    • End of the row of desks, you're lucky! We have to carry it to a lobby at the end of the office, and sort it there! And inevitably, whenever I clear the desk at the end of the day, the cleaners are trying to empty the recycling bins already, so my organic waste has 24 hours to fester before it actually leaves the office.
    • Here it was a 20% take-it-or-walk rate. Unsurprisingly, none took it. So far a few have had to walk. Irony is subcos' are, by and large 100% billable - a trick to, you know, get the contract renewed and avoid early termination So all the sludge that's on the permie payroll (no, not all, by any means) who are dragged over with every outsourcing deal, get to sit around doing sweet FA (the contractors have an interest in staying - they'll do it!) drinking the expensive shyte coffee should be an interesting time for the account execs if procurement get their way.
    • As a former member of IBM GTS in the US, we saw this all the time. Now that they're employing the same methods overseas in the legal manners they can...yep, squeezing as many pennies out of the non-BRIC(A) countries while shifting more or the work there. And slowly, Big Blue begins its descent...
  • Yahoo! IBM Pension and Retirement Issues message board: "The press is not doing its job" by "fhawontcutit". Full excerpt: Be on the lookout for press articles referring to "massive pension obligations". As Ellen Schultz points out in her book, "Retirement Heist", you need to look at the "massive" EXECUTIVE pension obligations:
    As executive pay became tied to stock performance, executives who cut pensions and retiree health care were actually doing themselves a favor. As they were cutting regular pensions, they were boosting executive pensions. Often what appeared to be an increase in pension expense was because of the executives, not the regular folks.

    http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/retirement-heist-u-pensions-plundere\ d-corporate-greed-author-131151510.html:

    Overstate the burden of rank-and-file retiree obligations to justify benefits cuts, while simultaneously using the savings to inflate executive pay and pensions. Hide growing executive pension liabilities, which at some companies now exceed the liabilities for the regular pension plans.
  • Glassdoor IBM reviews. Selected reviews follow:
    • IBM Global Services Salary Comparison” Former Employee in Tampa, FL. Pros: Easy on-boarding; lots of self autonomy; strong compensation packages; great benefits; liberal vacation policy.

      Cons: Too many required conference calls, slim resources through management for training, unrealistic annual goals, too many re-orgs and down-sizings only to re-hire again. Management is aloof and doesn't engage with reports, hard to get internal information, have to rely on the rumor mill. IBM thinks when you walk in the client's door for the first time the sale is 50% over on name recognition. Discontinuing products without fair warning to sales team.

      Advice to Senior Management: Clean some of the old guard who aren't producing but work the system to stay employed. Move them to challenging positions so they can't snooze on the job. Develop a better employee review process beyond 1 person's view. Ease travel restrictions for professionals, too much accounting time in expense reports. Get better control of HELP desk for communication equipment issues.

    • Mediocre work experience, with a few individual staff member exceptions, overall poor morale and internal culture.” Current Employee in Atlanta, GA. Pros: Company offers wide variety of opportunities for different roles, career paths - IF you can get support of your manager.

      Cons: Very few opportunities to build interpersonal and team relationship(s) with colleagues and coworkers as most are work from home. Spend lots of time on conference calls with cast of dozens or more. Very slow movement on projects due to "too many cooks," political wrangling and landscape. Difficult to build trust, as many are individual contributors focus on impressing management and rather than focusing on projects that help move the organization forward.

      Advice to Senior Management: Spend TOO much time on internal status updates - which seem to have little impact on results - internal reporting requires extreme amounts of bandwidth for staff members that could be better utilized on other projects. Spend too much time "weighing the pig than actually working to feed the pig."

    • Good for a jumping off point, bad for a career” Current Employee in Columbia, MO. Pros: Benefits are some of the best in the industry, IBM brand still looks good on a resume. Great place to gain experience. If you are a high performer and show it you can possibly be recognized for it with financial incentives but this also depends on how well you play into the politics more than anyone likes to admit. Lots of opportunities to build your skill-set, if you prove that you can get things done early on you will get the interesting high skill work as it comes in.

      Cons: In these new "delivery centers" micromanagement is the encouraged norm not the exception. Be prepared to be forced to sit though lots of useless "GDF education" seminars which rehash the same information over and over about how you should be working (and then management will want you to do it a different way anyway after the seminars.) Also once a year all employees have to use a time tracking tool for about a month, where everything that is done has to be logged and analyzed to decide if the work can be done efficiently by less people or not.

      This is an extreme cost cutting environment, instead of having a real catering service they contract that to a local gas station. Things in the building that break will not be fixed for months in the future, if they even are at all. Overtime hours getting revoked is the norm, some teams inside the building have lost entire clients due to the overtime crunches but management doesn't care.

      With this new "GDF methodology" the hiring of inexperienced people is also the norm. Plenty of people in low level system administration positions have never even logged into a server before.

      Salaries are also below market rate.

      The focus on team metrics is also a little extreme, too often it gets to the point where more time is spent trying to game the metrics system rather then trying to improve the real processes.

      People see the writing on the wall and know that in a few years most of the jobs will be done from India.

      Advice to Senior Management: There is some good stuff in the new GDF methodology but also lots of bad, stop trying to force it as the "one size fits all" solution to all of your problems.

      Stop outsourcing critical and high skill jobs to India, those of us in the US spend to much time cleaning things up after India breaks something, it has to be cheaper to just do it the right way to begin with (especially when SLA penalties are factored in).

      Stop the cost cutting environment and over-focus on secrecy, we don't even have windows in our office (they are covered with some sort of tint so you can't see in or out.) Comparisons are made all the time to a Soviet-era factory among employees.

    • Career in IBM” Current Senior Managing Consultant in Los Angeles, CA. Pros: A rather stable work environment (until your skills do not match market demands and you will be out quickly) Cons: You are responsible for your own career. No career development plan offers by your management team. Very minimal salary raise, if any, in the last few years. Advice to Senior Management: It seems to be just lip service when executives say IBM staffers are IBM's best asset. There is no career development plan for practitioners and the financial compensation has not been improved much, if at all, in the past 10 years. In addition, more and more benefits, such as the THANKS award, have been taken away.
    • A chance to learn with a huge net to catch you” Former Employee. Pros: Worked in the Software Group after being acquired. I was able to transition into a different type of role (product marketing, general management of a product) which was a great learning opportunity. Great for my career personally and there was a huge safety net underneath me while I made the mistakes that are natural Generally, IBM (as far as super large software companies goes) wears the white hat. Able to work from home when it was best for me and my family to do so.

      Cons: Meeting culture. Too many meetings. The natural politics that occur in a place of this size Too many IBM specific skills that you need to develop -- the bureaucracy gets in the way of progress too often.

      Advice to Senior Management: Personally, I was negatively impacted by a narcissistic bully in my management chain. Pleas to HR and management to remedy went unheeded by others in my group. HR or management needs to be empowered to root out these problems.

    • Awesome environment for work” Former Employee. Pros: Best salary package. Good working environment. Better employee-employer relationship. Happy to help seniors. Healthy competition for career growth. Cons: As long as i work there, I never found any cons in this company.
    • IBM Culture” Current Employee. Pros: Easy to open doors with IBM. Cons: Sales team culture is terrible. Low moral. Management out of touch
    • The place to be for new and innovative morale killers” Current Employee. Pros: Genuinely good people to work with at the individual contributor level.

      Cons: As a truly global country, all the money and resources flow to the growth markets like India, China, BRIC countries. For North America, it is nonstop cost cutting and a short term focus on meeting quarterly profit objectives. Example: No raises for North American based employees this year (raises handed out in June for the previous year's results). But the company recorded record revenues profits and free cash flows in the same year. How about sharing some of that success with all the folks that helped you get there?

      Advice to Senior Management: This company used to be led by engineering and sales. People focused on creating truly innovative solutions and taking good care of their customers. Now it's led by bean counters, focused on short term profit objectives at the expense of all else. Get back to what made IBM a great company - being a great provider of value to it's customers and a great place to work for it's employees. Not just a great stock to own. Your customers, employees and our smarter planet deserve better.

    • Doesn't belong in the HR outsourcing market” Former Employee. Pros: great benefits; no merit increases and small bonuses. Cons: It has no business in the HR outsourcing business; HR is a people business; IBM is a technology business. It won't outsource its HR function, but it's glad to do that for other companies willing to pay the price. Advice to Senior Management: I got be one of Ginni's first layoff casualties...she was in the CEO chair about a month when she laid off a few thousand. The company's fluid workforce model will come back to haunt them one day.
    • Great experience in Software Group as tech lead and manager” Current Employee in Durham, NC. Pros: Great place to work if you are interested in technology and prefer to work on products/projects that have a big impact on the world. Smart people. Good leadership development programs for recognized talent. Cons: Permission based, needs multiple layers of approvals for decisions. Large, so you could get lost if you don't have the right mentors, managers and colleagues. Less perks. Advice to Senior Management: Reduce process overhead
    • IBM Fishkill, NY- Disrespectful Management” Current Process Engineer in East Fishkill, NY. Pros: Excellent Location. Relative close to NY city. Lot of restaurants. Cons: Managements here are usually disrespectful. Salary is not competitive. Very expensive area to live. Advice to Senior Management: Some managers from Process Dev. (Litho/Etch/INT) are disrespectful. They don't give you any opportunity to grow, they just play game for their own interest. They need to be less technical and focus more on management, look for better salary, empower your employee, HR. How much does it cost to say "THANK U"???????????
    • Once great, get out while you can or hope for severance package” Current Employee. Pros: Work at home options are great, pay is adequate if outside major employment cities, benefits and 401k matching are great if employed pre 2000. Historically the severance packages are not too bad, so if you are let go and have been long time employee that may be worth sticking around for if you have options later. Cons: 2015 road map for EPS means they will keep cutting costs which has the temporary benefit of increased profits even while revenue is decreasing. As a result it's a cycle of people being RA'ed (laid off) or leaving, while those remaining are overworked and ready to leave at a moments notice. Eventually this will catch up with IBM, but in the mean time employees and services/products are suffering. Raises even for excellent performers don't keep up with inflation. Advice to Senior Management: Remember when you used to value employees and they weren't just "resources"? It may be too late to turn the ship, but shouldn't you at least try?
    • It was fine” Former Financial Analyst in Rochester, MN. Pros: The COE is a place where you can start your career, but it also is probably not the best place to make your career flourish. Cons: There are very few chances for advancement within the COE, and most people who go to work at the COE are gone within 2 weeks.
    • business analyst” Former Business Analyst in Atlanta, GA. Pros: can telecommute. good salary. good medical benefits. Cons: treat us employees like dirt. Advice to Senior Management: move all operations overseas
    • Flexible workplace but not the greatest pay or hours.” Current Employee in Poughkeepsie, NY. Pros: Pretty flexible work times, except if you have to work with IBMers overseas you have to use your personal hours, dinner/breakfast time to be on calls with different time zones. No personal time available anymore. Work comes in waves. When it's busy it's really stressful. We are finally starting to hire some new hires and new blood into the company. Still pretty top heavy and hard to move up. Cons: It seems like our budget for anything is smaller and smaller every year when we are reporting record profits. Healthcare benefits aren't great. A lot of out of pocket costs. They are outsourcing a lot. Advice to Senior Management: Our management up to 3rd line is doing the best they can.
    • Career Builder” Former Sales Manager in Bethesda, MD. Pros: Lots of opportunity for growth great foundation. Cons: Lower than average pay, too many average or below average workers allowed to collect a paycheck. It is difficult to manage out underperformers. Advice to Senior Management: Reward loyalty. Your long term staff is penalized through lower pay, you do not reward commitment and hard work. People with proven track records of success are making 25-30% less than unknown new hires.
    • very good image - nothing behind” Former Employee in Vienna (Austria). Pros: – very good image; - nothing behind. Cons: lives off good image; can´t deal with people that are not headcounts; expected a lot; - company didn´t live up to its values. Advice to Senior Management: – listen to your employees; - they know how the company can improve live your values otherwise find out what your real values are.
    • Don't waste your time!” Former Senior Financial Analyst in Somers, NY. Pros: Telecommuting -- it's how they keep you interested. Diversity.

      Cons: Either align yourself with an "executive sponsor" (someone you do the work for so they don't have to) and ride their coat tails from job to job or start the countdown 'til when your number comes up -- and everyone's number comes up usually around when you're 45-50 years old. No loyalty at all no matter if you've been a 2+ performer forever. Once they find a way to outsource your job -- they will, simple as that. You will waste the best years of your life trying to get ahead in a company where NO ONE gets ahead -- unless you're friends with the right folks.

      Completely unreasonable expectations for work hours. Nothing is ever enough. Only successful people (besides Sales) have no kids or make their families a completely secondary priority. They will talk about work/life balance but I am surprised they can do it with a straight face. Worst set of internal systems in corporate America. Change jobs internally every three years -- and then learn three new systems because every department has their own.

      No training. No positive reinforcement. No hope. Of the 14 managers I had in 14 years, 8 are no longer with the company and I haven't met any of the last 4 face-to-face. Costs too much.

      The people I know who HAVE somehow survived now HATE everything the company has become but feel too "trapped" to try and make a change. All that your work experience there readies you for are more lateral jobs within IBM. Nothing you learn is useful outside their walls.

      They have lost their soul. People are as expendable as MIPs. Get hired as a Director or don't even consider a job there -- oh yeah, they need scapegoat Directors too for the bad years so tread carefully. All this being said, they did me the biggest favor they could when they forced me to move on.

      Advice to Senior Management: Keep doing what you're doing -- it works! Nothing I could offer as counsel will ever matter to you.

  • Alliance for Retired Americans: Friday Alert. This week's articles include:
    • Nearly 70,000 Alliance Members Join VP Biden on Teleconference Call
    • Voter Intimidation Billboards in Ohio and Wisconsin Taken Down
    • Voter ID Laws Still Casting a Shadow
    • Detailing a Second Term Agenda
    • Coyle Joins Teachers in Albany
  • New York Times: Weighing the Odds of Disability, for Insurance Purposes. By Paul Sullivan. Excerpts: Of all the types of insurance people are thinking about, disability insurance may be the last on the list.

    One reason is that most people who have it got it through their employer and have given it little thought. Another is that people are not likely to go out and buy it on their own because it is so expensive, the exception being certain occupational groups, like doctors. Yet it does serve an important purpose in replacing a portion of your salary if you get hurt or become sick and are unable to work for several months or more. ...

    So how do you make an informed decision?

  • InfoWorld: Demand for software engineers keeps climbing -- and so do the salaries. A hot job market for software engineers is driving up salaries, with the biggest paychecks earned in California. By Ted Samson. Excerpts: These days, it's good to be a software engineer, as demand for quality coders is rising. The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects 30 percent job growth in coming years. What's more, CareerCast recently deemed software engineer the all-around best job for 2012, beating out such positions as actuary, HR manager, and financial planner. Java, mobile, and .Net developer jobs are especially hot.

    In line with Economics 101, that increased demand for software engineers means increasing salaries. The national average for a software engineer's base salary is currently $92,648, according to Glassdoor, marking an increase of 2.5 percent compared to 2011. But depending on where you work -- both in terms of your employer and your geographical location -- you could be take home more than $100,000 per year. Then again, even if you work for one of the major tech companies, your base salary may fall below the national average.

    Where are the plum jobs these days for software engineers? According to recent data from Glassdoor, Google currently offers the highest average salary among 15 major tech companies at $128,336 per year. Ranked second is Facebook, which pays its software engineers an average of $123,626 per year. (Glassdoor came up with these figures based on at least 20 salary reports per company from October 2011 through October of this year.) ...

    On the other end of the spectrum, IBM reportedly offers the lower average salary to software engineers at $89,390 (below the national average of $92,648). Intel, too, comes up short at $92,194. HP, meanwhile, pays its engineers a bit more than the national average at $95,567. Qualcomm qualifies for the Under $100K Club at $98,964 as well.

  • Huffington Post: Why Women Over 40 Make the Best Interns. By Melani Ward. Excerpt: When it comes to getting the job done, the backside of 40 never looked so good.

    If you think deepening wrinkles, the need for a more flexible schedule due to multiple kids at home, and a large resume gap because of raising kids are the only reasons to welcome a 40-plus-year-old "returner" into your office, think again.

    Those things are great. Wrinkles show character, raising kids is the hardest job in the world and a resume gap shows that priorities are important to you. All good. However, there are plenty more reasons why recent college grads have nothing on women over 40 and why when it comes time to fill your next internship spot, it would make good sense to cast your net into the "returnship" crowd.

  • New York Times: Many in Middle Class ‘Guess’ on Retirement Needs. By Ann Carrns. Excerpts: Three-fourths of middle-class Americans say their estimate of what they’ll need to live on in retirement is based on “some sort of guess,” a new survey finds.

    And those guesses often appear off the mark, according to the annual Wells Fargo Retirement Survey.

    For instance, middle-class Americans say they believe the median cost of their out-of-pocket health care costs in retirement will be $47,000. But the Center for Retirement Research estimates a typical couple at age 65 can expect to spend $260,000 or more over the rest of their lives.

    Further, when asked what percentage of their nest egg they expect to withdraw annually in retirement, the median — or typical — withdrawal predicted by middle-class Americans is 10 percent. But most experts recommend annual withdrawals of 3 to 4 percent.

  • Wall Street Journal: The Let's-Sell-Our-House- And-See-the-World. How one couple walked away from all they owned and are putting down new roots— one country at a time. By Lynne Martin. Excerpts: I'm 70 years old. My husband, Tim, is 66. For most of our lives, each of us lived and worked in California. Today, our home is wherever we and our 30-inch suitcases are.

    In short, we're senior gypsies. In early 2011 we sold our house in California and moved the few objects we wanted to keep into a 10-by-15-foot storage unit. Since then, we have lived in furnished apartments and houses in Mexico, Argentina, Florida, Turkey, France, Italy and England. In the next couple of months, we will live in Ireland and Morocco before returning briefly to the U.S. for the holidays.

    As I write this, we have settled into a darling one-bedroom apartment a hundred yards from the River Thames, a 25-minute train ride from the heart of London. We have a knack for moving in. Within a few minutes of plunking down our belongings in new digs, we have made it our own: The alarm clock is beside the bed; my favorite vegetable peeler and instant-read thermometer are in the kitchen; and our laptop computers are hooked up and humming. Together we begin learning how to make the appliances cooperate.

    Given all that, I suppose a better way to describe us is gypsies who like to put down roots. At least for a month or two.

    Why we're doing this is simple: My husband and I—in a heart-to-heart conversation during a trip to Mexico—realized that both of us are happier when we're on the road. We enjoy excellent health and share a desire to see the world in bigger bites than a three-week vacation allows. The notion of living like the locals in other countries thrilled us, and after almost 18 months of living "home free," we are still delighted with our choice. Even a "cocooning" day is more interesting in Paris or Istanbul.

  • Huffington Post: Older Adults Should Be Able to Retire With Dignity and Security. By John Taylor. Excerpts: Older adults have been disproportionately harmed by the financial crisis. This has made financial planning and aging in place even more challenging. According to the Center for Housing Policy, 80 percent of older adults are homeowners. Millions of seniors are underwater on their mortgages as a result of the housing crisis, meaning they owe more on their mortgages than their homes are currently worth. Hundreds of thousands more have lost their homes to foreclosure. Scammers have made this situation even worse by targeting older adults with foreclosure rescue scams and other schemes.

    According to the National Council on Aging, more than 23 million Americans ages 60 and up are living at or below 250 percent of the federal poverty level, which is $27,925 per year for a single person. Meanwhile, the Social Security and Medicare programs are under attack. Weakened Social Security and Medicare programs would put more costs on the backs of seniors and renege on the promise of those programs. Proposals to privatize Social Security would put retirement funds at the mercy of the same erratic market that wiped out many pension funds in the financial crisis. This fundamental alteration of Social Security into "Social Insecurity" must not be allowed to happen.

    And in addition to these problems and threats, employer-sponsored defined benefit and even defined contribution retirement plans are on the decline, taking away a key part of the U.S. retirement system and increasing uncertainty.

New on the Alliance@IBM Site
  • Job Cut Reports
    • Comment 10/20/12: The slaves should revolt. SSR's are leaving to go work for competitors and nearly double their salary. Client facing positions are more lucrative in other companies as well. How can IBM continue to grossly underpay their employees? -Rose-
    • Comment 10/20/12: Strong rumor that the Transition out program will be offered again in November. Anyone else hearing that? -HowManyThisTime?-
    • Comment 10/22/12: I am "command and control" for GDF client. Means I oversee the global (India) resources doing the day to day work. Mgnt wants local resource for that in case customer wants to interface. DPEs also use C&C as single point of contact and scapegoat for when global resources mess up -Command and Control-
    • Comment 10/23/12: I was part of the March GTS action, blessing in disguise, got my sev package, got paid summer off where I utilized time to brush up on skills, and learn job searching, took six months to get onto a year long contract, BUT, I have work for a year, at IBM it was month to month and IBM never lets you know if you will be next. Second thing, on contract I work 40 hours a week for set rate, not "this is your salary, but we expect 50 hours and we "really" expect 60 and unless you work 70, then that 2 you worked for and were told you were on track to get, when it came time to be reviewed found out that the 2nd and 3rd line managers told the first lines to subtract one from everyone's PBC, just to meet numbers. There is life after IBM, you may need to work at it, but you have skills and they are valued (not by IBM) but others do, when you go to the next job you WILL find your organizational and product skills are a lot more valuable than IBM leads you to believe. And no, IBM is no longer paying better than the outside market, in fact outside pays better, especially with contract. -George Lennon-
    • Comment 10/24/12: @Rose-- you are correct, I left IBM for a 20% pay increase. Prepare yourselves for another round of brow bashing and ultimately layoffs. You can make a plan for your future by taking control or you can fail to plan and end up losing the little you have. Organize and Unionize. -Greener-Grass-
    • Comment 10/24/12: With the recent 10% drop in the price of IBM stock, it is time for IBM Management to admit that its "2015 Road Map" has been an abject failure. The stark reality is that IBM revenue is not going to grow - not when IBM continues to routinely cheat its top sales people out of their rightfully earned commissions. The 2015 Road Map has turned out to be one of the biggest 'pump and dump' schemes in the history of U.S. stock markets. The SEC should be investigating IBM business practices, if it is not doing so already, and handing down indictments of the IBM Senior Managers who have personally profited from this scheme. -Ginni Madoff-
    • Comment 10/26/12: Subcontractor cuts occurring today. I've heard of 2 contractors let go in GTS-SD already; today is their last day. This was a directive from the executives above. -new voting member-
    • Comment 10/27/12: Does anyone know about any resource action plans taking place in November? It's been way too quiet at work lately... makes me nervous. -impending-
News and Opinion Concerning Health Savings Accounts, Medical Costs and Health Care Reform
  • PBS Newshour: Health Costs: How the U.S. Compares With Other Countries. By Jason Kane. Excerpts: How much is good health care worth to you? $8,233 per year? That's how much the U.S. spends per person.

    Worth it?

    That figure is more than two-and-a-half times more than most developed nations in the world, including relatively rich European countries like France, Sweden and the United Kingdom. On a more global scale, it means U.S. health care costs now eat up 17.6 percent of GDP.

    A sizable slice of Americans -- including some top-ranking politicians -- say the cost may be unfortunate but the U.S. has "the best health care in the world."

    But let's consider what 17 cents of every U.S. dollar is purchasing. According to the most recent report from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) -- an international economic group comprised of 34 member nations -- it's not as much as many Americans expect.

    In the United States:

    • There are fewer physicians per person than in most other OECD countries. In 2010, for instance, the U.S. had 2.4 practicing physicians per 1,000 people -- well below below the OECD average of 3.1.
    • The number of hospital beds in the U.S. was 2.6 per 1,000 population in 2009, lower than the OECD average of 3.4 beds.
    • Life expectancy at birth increased by almost nine years between 1960 and 2010, but that's less than the increase of over 15 years in Japan and over 11 years on average in OECD countries. The average American now lives 78.7 years in 2010, more than one year below the average of 79.8 years.
  • American Medical Association: “Frequent flyers” not seen as abusing emergency departments. Studies in four states conclude that most heavy users are coming in for urgent conditions. By Jennifer Lubell. Excerpts: Studies on emergency department patients in different parts of the country challenge the long-time misconception that so-called frequent flyers — those who regularly end up in EDs — are abusing their access to emergency care. Instead, a high proportion of these patients have chronic conditions and mental disorders and go to the ED because they don’t have another readily accessible source of care. ...

    Social factors can contribute to why these patients end up in the ED, said Susan Mende, MPH, BSN, senior program officer with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. A diabetic patient who comes to the ED in a diabetic coma because he or she is not getting adequate, ongoing care may not have a house in which to draw insulin safely, or “might have tumultuous home conditions that don’t support managing diabetes,” she said. “So sometimes emergent medical problems are the tip of the iceberg.”

  • The New Yorker: Beware of RomneyCare. By James Surowiecki. Excerpts: Mitt Romney can be a hard man to pin down. But there is one thing that he’s been clear about: if he becomes President, he will repeal Obamacare. That simple promise, more than any other that Romney has made, illuminates what is most at stake in this year’s election. The campaigns may spend most of their time talking about taxes and jobs. But health care is where the election’s outcome will have the most immediate and powerful impact on how Americans live.

    Abolishing Obamacare would eliminate subsidies for people buying insurance and rescind regulations requiring insurance companies to guarantee coverage and benefits (for instance, to people with preëxisting conditions). Romney’s proposed alternative is to give individuals a tax break when they buy insurance and to push them toward high-deductible insurance plans, which he believes will make them more rigorous and price-conscious in choosing doctors and treatments. Romney also wants to reform Medicare by encouraging more competition among private insurers. The details are skimpy, but the core principle is that unleashing the power of the free market will bring down costs and raise quality.

    This is an appealing vision. In most areas of the economy, free-market principles insure that products and services keep improving, and that consumers get better and better deals. But the free market, though it may be the best way of allocating new TVs and cars, falters when it comes to paying for bypass surgery or chemotherapy. The reasons for this were established nearly fifty years ago, by the economist Kenneth Arrow, in a classic article entitled “Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care.” Arrow showed that health care is distinctive in ways that limit the power of the market. Because people don’t have the expertise to evaluate doctors, hospitals, or treatments, it’s hard for them to comparison-shop. Because they can’t pay for major care out of pocket, they must rely on insurance, thereby often losing the final say in what to buy or how much to spend. More fundamentally, markets work only when consumers have the power to say no if the price isn’t right. Yet it’s very hard for people to say no in the case of things like end-of-life care or brain surgery.

    The evidence for Arrow’s thesis is all around us. Take the idea that high deductibles will transform the health-care system. It’s certainly true that giving consumers more skin in the game can make them better shoppers. But Americans’ out-of-pocket health-care spending is already higher than it is in most developed countries, and our over-all costs still aren’t any lower. And while a well-known study called the Rand Health Insurance Experiment showed that higher co-pays can encourage people to forgo unnecessary care, the same study showed that higher co-pays also encourage sick people to forgo necessary care, which raises costs in the long run. Increasing co-pays sometimes makes sense, but it’s no magic bullet.

  • High Roads: Eight Things Retirees Should Know About Health Insurance Following Health Care Reform. Excerpts: “Even if retirees have been on their health insurance plan for a number of years, they may be surprised to see changes this year as a result of health care reform,” said Cynthia Weidner, vice president consulting, HighRoads. “Now is not the time to just cruise through open enrollment on ‘auto pilot.’ Health care reform is changing the way benefits plan coverage options are communicated and, in some cases, retirees may see significant changes to their health insurance coverage. This is a great time to learn everything you can about your health care plan to be sure you don’t face any unexpected challenges next year.”

    The first thing that is important for retirees to know is that under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) they will see changes in their annual open enrollment benefits materials. This includes the addition of a Summary of Benefits Coverage (SBC) document. SBCs are benefit plan summaries that are intended to provide “clear, understandable and straightforward information on what health plans will cover, what limitations or conditions will apply, and what they will pay for,” according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    However, retirees should not rely on the information in their SBC alone to make health insurance plan choices. To minimize surprises and make the most of health insurance plan options, consider these eight tips...

  • USA Today: Discount prescription drug coupons no bargain. By Kevin Pho. Excerpts: With the popularity of daily-deal sites such as Groupon, it probably shouldn't be surprising another industry is capitalizing on the concept. As the cost of prescription drugs soars, more patients are turning to online coupons, drug company discount cards and promotional offers in magazines to save money.

    In the past year, about 19 million Americans used these incentives to fill prescriptions. Since 2009, the health care industry has seen a nearly fivefold increase in the use of discounts. Today, drug companies offer 395 medications, up from 86 drugs in 2009, under these programs.

    In truth, these discounts are a good deal for the drug companies, but not so good for patients or their insurers.

    For example, I normally prescribe to patients with high cholesterol the generic statin drug simvastatin, which on average has a monthly co-pay of about $10. But I'm finding more patients requesting Lipitor, Pfizer's brand name statin, because of a Web coupon, which discounts co-pays to $4. But Lipitor costs about $1,400 more a year than simvastatin. So while patients pay less, their insurers pay substantially more.

    In fact, drug coupons are estimated to increase prescription drug spending by $32 billion over the next 10 years. Over time, those costs will come back to haunt patients. Though patients with coupons might find that their prescription costs less that month, "overall what it does is to raise costs for everyone, including themselves," according to Susan Pisano, a spokeswoman for the industry trade group America's Health Insurance Plans.

  • Kaiser Health Care News: Seven Factors Driving Up Your Health Care Costs. By Julie Appleby. Excerpts: There is no one villain in the battle against rising health care costs. Currently, the United States spends more on health care services than any other country, exceeding $2.6 trillion, or about 18 percent of gross domestic product. Most years, medical spending rises faster than inflation and the economy as a whole. Many factors -- and nearly everyone -- contributes to those increases.

    Here are seven ways you or your medical providers play a role, based on a recent report from the Bipartisan Policy Center, a think tank in Washington, D.C.

    1. We pay our doctors, hospitals and other medical providers in ways that reward doing more, rather than being efficient. ...

    2. We're growing older, sicker and fatter. ...

    3. We want new drugs, technologies, services and procedures. ...

    4. We get tax breaks on buying health insurance -- and the cost to patients of seeking care is often low. ...

    5. We don't have enough information to make decisions on which medical care is best for us. ...

    6. Our hospitals and other providers are increasingly gaining market share and are better able to demand higher prices. ...

    7. We have supply and demand problems, and legal issues that complicate efforts to slow spending. ...

  • Reuters: Are healthcare copays going the way of dial phone? By Beth Pinsker Gladstone. Excerpts: This open enrollment season big blocks of 20,000 or 50,000 Americans at a time are transitioning away from the health plan design that has dominated the last two decades, which requires workers to shell out a copayment when they visit certain doctors - often $20, $40 or some other agreed-upon amount. ...

    In fact, only half of large companies tracked by benefits consultant Towers Watson still offer health plans with copays. Its list of 849 large companies includes employers with more than 1,000 employees, most with over 5,000.

    What is on tap for the other half of workers is the world of coinsurance - paying a percentage of healthcare costs, which can range from 10 percent to 40 percent, with varying amounts for deductibles. ...

    Your employer is not going to change course - no matter how much you complain - but management does not want bad feelings. Companies often pony up incentives such as cash in flexible spending accounts (FSAs) or health savings accounts (HSAs) if you take biometric screenings such as a cholesterol test. Some offer free flu shots, 24-hour nurse lines, health club reimbursement, yoga classes and more.

News and Opinion Concerning the "War on the Middle Class"
Minimize "It is a restatement of laissez-faire-let things take their natural course without government interference. If people manage to become prosperous, good. If they starve, or have no place to live, or no money to pay medical bills, they have only themselves to blame; it is not the responsibility of society. We mustn't make people dependent on government- it is bad for them, the argument goes. Better hunger than dependency, better sickness than dependency."

"But dependency on government has never been bad for the rich. The pretense of the laissez-faire people is that only the poor are dependent on government, while the rich take care of themselves. This argument manages to ignore all of modern history, which shows a consistent record of laissez-faire for the poor, but enormous government intervention for the rich." From Economic Justice: The American Class System, from the book Declarations of Independence by Howard Zinn.

  • Washington Post: U.S. jobs or more outsourcing? Future is unclear for one mortgage-servicing firm. By Allan Sloan. Excerpts: Waterloo, Iowa’s sixth-largest city, is a blue-collar community located off Interstate 380, the “Avenue of the Saints” that runs from St. Louis to St. Paul, Minn. Go a few blocks from the Crossroads Mall in west Waterloo, you find something atypical: a big white collar employer, Residential Capital LLC.

    ResCap, as it’s known, is a mortgage company located on a nicely landscaped, 17-acre campus. Its 950 employees in Iowa get wages averaging about $35,000 a year — pretty good money for Waterloo — along with health insurance, tuition assistance and other benefits.

    Inside the complex, you run into people like Tracy Zobel, who radiates a Midwestern work ethic and an aw-shucks charm.

    Zobel, 44, a mother of four married to a dairy farmer, has spent 18 years working her way up from part-time call center rep to vice president in charge of loss mitigation. She loves ResCap, loves her job and loves the fact that she’s the source of health insurance for her family. ...

    If this all sounds almost too bucolic and wholesome to be true — well, it may not be true much longer. Waterloo’s future could be determined by an auction being held 1,059 miles away, at the Sheraton New York Hotel in midtown Manhattan, on Tuesday. ...

    The auction’s outcome will likely determine whether most of ResCap servicing employees will keep their jobs — and whether the mortgage borrowers that they work with will deal primarily with American loan servicers, as they do now, or with servicers in the Indian cities of Bangalore and Mumbai. ...

    Based on our reading of Ocwen’s numbers, it has moved almost every American job in the portfolios it has bought to Bangalore and Mumbai. It would presumably do the same to the ResCap portfolio, absent any restrictions on moving the jobs. This is perfectly legal — and employing folks in India is much cheaper than hiring Americans in places such as Waterloo.

    In addition to having cheap labor, Ocwen’s servicing subsidiary also has low taxes. It recently moved the subsidiary’s headquarters to a special Virgin Islands tax zone. Thus, it remained a U.S. company eligible to participate in federal programs — but it will get 90 percent of its U.S. corporate taxes forgiven, thanks to the benefits of the special tax zone. ...

    The other known bidder for the ResCap rights is Nationstar Mortgage, controlled by the Fortress Investment Group. As a publicly traded private equity house, Fortress is taxophobic in its own business — but Nationstar is sending ever-larger checks to the U.S. Treasury, despite having tax-loss carryforwards on its books. That’s because it can use only about $11 million of its almost $200 million of carryforwards in any given year.

    Nationstar proudly tells all and sundry that all of its employees are in the United States, and that it’s a “high-touch” servicer. “High-touch” is marketing-speak for “trying to provide really good service.” For example, Nationstar says it assigns an account officer to every troubled borrower, so that that the borrower is always dealing with the same person rather than getting whoever happens to be free. The theory is that providing better and earlier service to borrowers, especially troubled borrowers, improves the performance of the loans being serviced. ...

    Meanwhile, folks in Waterloo wait and worry about the auction results, “When I started, I was 21, I was a kid,” says Sharon Robinson, who in 28 years has risen from mail clerk to a top consumer-service post. “I wanted full-time employment and benefits, and I was just going to stay here until I found something better. And I haven’t found something better; I’ve never even had a reason to look.” After next week, however, that may no longer be the case.

  • The Smirking Chimp: Plutocrats Want to Own Your Vote. By Bill Moyers and Michael Winship. Excerpts: The new Gilded Age is roaring down on us – an uncaged tiger on a rampage. Walk out to the street in front of our office here in Manhattan, look to the right and you can see the symbol of it: a fancy new skyscraper going up two blocks away. When finished, this high rise among high rises will tower a thousand feet, the tallest residential building in the city.

    The New York Times has dubbed it “the global billionaires’ club” — and for good reason. At least of two of the apartments are under contract for more than 90 million dollars each. Others, more modest, range in price from 45 million dollars to more than 50 million dollars. The mega-rich have been buying these places “looking for a place to stash their cash,” a realtor from Sotheby’s explained to the Times. “A lot of what is happening,” she said, “… is about wealth preservation.”

    Simultaneously, the powers-that-be have just awarded Donald Trump the right to run a golf course in the Bronx, which taxpayers are spending at least $97 million to build — what “amounts to a public subsidy,” says the indignant city comptroller, “for a luxury golf course.” Good grief — a handout to the plutocrat’s plutocrat.

    This, in a city where economic inequality rivals that of a third-world country. Of America’s 25 largest cities, New York is now the most unequal. The median income for the bottom 20% last year was less than $9,000, while the top one percent of New Yorkers has an average annual income of $2.2 million. ...

    But as appalling as all this may be, here’s a new revelation of which you may not be aware. The plutocrats know it and love it — and the rest of us should be forewarned: When the Supreme Court made its infamous Citizens United decision, liberating plutocrats to buy our elections fair and square, the justices may have effectively overturned rules that kept bosses from ordering employees to do political work on company time. Election law expert Trevor Potter told us that now “corporations argue that it is a constitutionally protected use of corporate ‘resources’ to order employees to do political work or attend campaign events — even if the employee opposes the candidate, or is threatened with being fired for failure to do what the corporation asks!” ...

    Back in the first the Gilded Age, in the 19th century, bosses in company towns lined up their workers and marched them to vote as a bloc. Now, the Gilded Age is back , with a vengeance. Welcome to the plutocracy – the remains of the ol’ USA.

  • Huffington Post: Defying Gravity: The History of 40 Years of Wealth Falling Up. By Dan Froomkin. Excerpts: Who Stole the American Dream? By Hedrick Smith Random House. 557 pages.

    Who stole the American Dream? The short answer to the question in the title of Hedrick Smith's new book is: The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Wal-Mart.

    But the longer answer is one heck of a story, told by one of the great journalists of our time.

    In his sweeping, authoritative examination of the last four decades of the American economic experience, Smith describes the long, relentless decline of the middle class -- a decline that was not by accident, but by design.

    He dates it back to a private memo -- in effect, a political call to arms -- issued to the nation's business leaders in 1971 by Lewis F. Powell, Jr., a corporate attorney soon to become a Supreme Court justice. From that point forward, Smith writes, corporate America threw off any sense of restraint or social obligation and instead unstintingly leveraged its money and political power to pursue its own interests.

    The result was nothing less than a shift in gravity. Starting in the early 1970s, every major economic trend -- increased productivity, globalization, tax law overhauls, and the phasing out of pensions in favor of 401(k)s -- produced the same result: The benefits fell upward.

  • Huffington Post: Walmart, Temp Agencies Sued For Minimum Wage, Overtime Violations. By Christina Wilkie. Excerpts: Walmart and two staffing agencies in the Chicago area were named as defendants in a class action lawsuit filed Monday in Illinois. The suit alleges that Walmart, Labor Ready Midwest, and QPS Employment Group violated federal and state laws by denying workers legally mandated overtime pay and in some cases, paying them less than minimum wage for hours worked. ...

    Anthony Wright, a temp worker at Labor Ready who is named in the suit said in a statement to the media, "There have been so many times I've been told to stay late after my shift to finish stocking the shelves, but I didn't know they wouldn't pay me for it." Wright has worked at some of the area Walmart stores since late last year, he said.

    Another worker, Twanda Burk, said in a statement to the media, "I only get paid minimum wage and yet Labor Ready and Walmart still try to cheat me by not paying me for the time I actually work. I've proven that I'm a good worker, and they just want to take advantage of that."

  • Huffington Post: Ikea, eBay Avoid Paying UK Taxes, Reports Allege. Excerpt: Avoiding taxes is all the rage these days, especially among major companies. Ikea and eBay are two of the latest to face scrutiny over accusations that they’re avoiding taxes while still profiting in the country. The claims come after a Reuters investigation revealed that Starbucks paid no corporate income taxes in the UK over the past three years, even though the coffee chain made 1.2 billion pounds in the country during that period.
  • New York Times: Wall St. May Not Cheer, but Obama’s Been Good for Stocks. By Jeff Sommer. Excerpts: “Are you better off than you were four years ago?” ...

    In the presidential debate last Tuesday on Long Island, and through much of this campaign season, Mitt Romney has been raising a similar question. He said last week that middle-class incomes have declined since President Obama took office, while gasoline prices have risen. And much as Mr. Reagan did several decades ago, Mr. Romney suggested that Americans are worse off today than they were four years earlier. ...

    Through Friday, since Mr. Obama’s inauguration — his first 1,368 days in office — the Dow Jones industrial average has gained 67.9 percent. That’s an extremely strong performance — the fifth best for an equivalent period among all American presidents since 1900. The Bespoke Investment Group calculated those returns for The New York Times. ...

    “What I find most ironic about these numbers is that one of Obama’s weaknesses is said to be his economic record,” said Paul T. Hickey, Bespoke’s co-founder. “While the stock market isn’t a complete reflection of the economy, it is an important indicator, and the stock market is one of the great things the president has working in his favor. But it’s a sensitive subject. With Wall Street so despised by the average American right now, it’s probably something he doesn’t want to be too quick to trumpet. But facts are facts.” ...

    It’s often said that Wall Street prefers Mitt Romney to Mr. Obama, Mr. Hickey observed, yet the stock market has flourished under the president — and under Democratic presidents generally. Since 1900, it has returned 7.1 percent annually when Democrats have occupied the White House, and only 3 percent under Republicans. ...

    Are you better off than you were four years ago? For stock portfolios, at least, the last four years have been bumpy but they haven’t been bad at all.

  • New York Times editorial: The Myth of Job Creation. The headlines from the last presidential debate focused on President Obama challenging Mitt Romney on issue after issue. There was a less noticed, but no less remarkable, moment when Mr. Obama agreed with Mr. Romney on something — and both were entirely wrong.

    The exchange began with a question about the offshoring of American jobs. Part of Mr. Obama’s answer was that federal investments in education, science and research would help to ensure that companies invest and hire in the United States. Mr. Romney interrupted. “Government does not create jobs,” he said. “Government does not create jobs.”

    It was a decidedly crabbed response to a seemingly uncontroversial observation, and yet Mr. Obama took the bait. He said his political opponents had long harped on “this notion that I think government creates jobs, that that somehow is the answer. That’s not what I believe.” He went on to praise free enterprise and to say that government’s role is to create the conditions for everyone to have a fair shot at success.

    So, they agree. Government does not create jobs.

    Except that it does, millions of them — including teachers, police officers, firefighters, soldiers, sailors, astronauts, epidemiologists, antiterrorism agents, park rangers, diplomats, governors (Mr. Romney’s old job) and congressmen (like Paul Ryan).

    First, the basics. At last count, government at all levels — federal, state and local — employed 22 million Americans, with the largest segment working in public education. Is that too many? No. Since the late 1980s, the number of public-sector workers has averaged about 7.3 for every 100 people. With the loss of 569,000 government jobs since June 2009, that ratio now stands at about 7 per 100.

    Public-sector job loss means trouble for everyone. Government jobs are crucial to education, public health and safety, environmental protection, defense, homeland security and myriad other functions that the private sector cannot fulfill. They are also critical for private-sector job growth in two fundamental ways. First, the government gets its supplies from private-sector companies, which is why Republican senators like John McCain have been frantically warning about the dire effects on job creation if Congress moves ahead with planned military spending cuts. (Republicans insisted upon the cuts as part of their ill-advised showdown over the debt ceiling.) Second, government spending on supplies and salaries reverberates strongly through the economy, increasing demand and with it, employment.

  • New York Times op-ed: The Secret of Our Non-Success. By Paul Krugman. Excerpts: The U.S. economy finally seems to be recovering in earnest, with housing on the rebound and job creation outpacing growth in the working-age population. But the news is good, not great — it will still take years to restore full employment — and it has been a very long time coming. Why has the slump been so protracted?

    The answer — backed by overwhelming evidence — is that this is what normally happens after a severe financial crisis. But Mitt Romney’s economic team rejects that evidence. And this denialism bodes ill for policy if Mr. Romney wins next month. ...

  • Huffington Post: Romney Rally At Red Rocks Amphitheatre Raises Spectre Of FDR, New Deal. By Matt Ferner. Excerpts: Better known for legendary live music, spectacular vistas, clouds of pot smoke and, of course, a beloved Dancing Security Guard, Red Rocks Amphitheatre is going political with a Mitt Romney rally Tuesday night -- and given the tight race in the Centennial State, the red tinged sandstone at the foot of Mt. Morrison may just symbolize Colorado's return to a red state in 2012.

    Red Rocks will most definitely serve as a stunning backdrop for what will likely be Romney's last large-scale rally in the state before Election Day. But as politically innocuous a setting as Red Rocks may seem, its entire existence represents a political philosophy that is in stark contrast to the Romney campaign.

    Red Rocks was built by the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC), a Depression-era public work relief program under President Franklin D. Roosevelt's "New Deal" that put unemployed men, ages 17-23, to work. Over a nine year span, the CCC employed 2.5 million young men which provided them with shelter, clothing, food and a small wage. ...

    In a guest blog at The Denver Post, Democratic strategist and speechwriter for former Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter, Laura Chapin brutally highlights the irony of the Romney event at Red Rocks:

    Romney said at the Oct. 16 debate that he doesn’t believe government creates jobs. Red Rocks has created thousands of jobs, public and private, contributed to the local economy, and has been a source of happiness for millions of people over the last 70 years. It is a magical place for everyone who goes there.

    Red Rocks was built with the peoples’ money and then given back to them to enjoy, the definition of public investment. It took believing in ourselves and believing in our national heart’s ability to build something big and something lasting that created Red Rocks. And next Tuesday that magnificent backdrop will put lie to every small-minded word that comes out of Mitt Romney’s mouth.

    ColoradoPols also weighed in on the irony, breathing new life into the critique of the Republican National Convention's day two theme "We Built It:"

    Think about it: hundreds of men put to work by the government for five years to build... a concert hall? So Dodge Trucks--another recipient of taxpayer bailout dollars (!)--could sponsor the Red Rocks Summer Concert Series all these years later? Seriously, folks, is there a self-respecting modern-day Republican out there who would not have instinctively called the idea of using taxpayer dollars to build Red Rocks Amphitheatre a "boondoggle?"
  • New York Times op-ed: Snow Job on Jobs. By Paul Krugman. Excerpts: Mitt Romney talks a lot about jobs. But does he have a plan to create any?

    You can defend President Obama’s jobs record — recovery from a severe financial crisis is always difficult, and especially so when the opposition party does its best to block every policy initiative you propose. And things have definitely improved over the past year. Still, unemployment remains high after all these years, and a candidate with a real plan to make things better could make a strong case for his election.

    But Mr. Romney, it turns out, doesn’t have a plan; he’s just faking it. In saying that, I don’t mean that I disagree with his economic philosophy; I do, but that’s a separate point. I mean, instead, that Mr. Romney’s campaign is telling lies: claiming that its numbers add up when they don’t, claiming that independent studies support its position when those studies do no such thing.

    Before I get there, however, let me take a minute to talk about Mr. Romney’s claim that he knows how to fix the economy because he’s been a successful businessman. That would be a dubious claim even if he were honestly representing his business career, because the skills needed to run a business and those needed to manage economic policy are very different. In any case, however, his portrait of his own experience is so misleading that it takes your breath away.

    For Mr. Romney, who started as a business consultant and then moved into the heady world of private equity, insists on portraying himself as a plucky small businessman.

    I am not making this up. In Tuesday’s debate, he declared, “I came through small business. I understand how hard it is to start a small business.” In his speech at the Republican convention, he declared, “When I was 37, I helped start a small company.”

    Ahem. It’s true that when Bain Capital started, it had only a handful of employees. But it had $37 million in funds, raised from sources that included wealthy Europeans investing through Panamanian shell companies and Central American oligarchs living in Miami while death squads associated with their families ravaged their home nations. Hey, doesn’t every plucky little start-up have access to that kind of financing?

  • AlterNet: Inside Bain's Chinese Sensata Factories, Where Workers Put in 12-Hour Days for $.99-$1.35 an Hour Bain didn't build that new factory -- the Chinese Government did. By Joshua Holland. Excerpts: Mitt Romney has made Obama's out-of-context “you didn't build that” quote a central theme of his campaign. It's ironic, as Mitt Romney is going to profit just before the election when Bain-owned Sensata Technologies moves 170 high-tech jobs from Freeport, Illinois, to a plant in China built for the firm by the Chinese government.

    Sensata enjoyed record revenues last year – this isn't about making the “hard choices” necessary to save a failing enterprise. The workers in Freeport have been working 24 hours a day, in three shifts. They make $14-17 per hour, with benefits.

    According to a report by the Institute for Global Labour and Human Rights, one of Bain's first actions after buying Sensata was to set up “12 Sensata/Bain capital funds 'organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands' so as to avoid paying taxes.” They'll get a small tax break for relocating the plant – the one Mitt Romney insisted did not exist during the first debate – and then use those offshore funds to defer taxes on some of the income the company generates.

    American tax-payers, on the other hand, have paid $780,000 to retrain some of Sensata's laid off workers in Illinois, according to the New York Times. One would be hard pressed to come up with a clearer example of capturing private gains while socializing the costs. ...

    We've heard a lot about the workers in Freeport. But on this week's AlterNet Radio Hour, I spoke with Charles Kernaghan, director of the Institute for Global Labour and Human Rights, about what life is like for the Chinese workers in Sensata's existing Chinese plants. The podcast below is about 20 minutes long – give it a listen.

  • The National Memo: No Denial: ‘Son Of Detroit’ Profited From Bailout — And Jobs Shipped To China. By Joe Conason. Excerpts: “I’m a son of Detroit. I was born in Detroit. My dad was head of a car company. I like American cars,” said Mitt Romney on Monday night when he met with President Obama to discuss foreign policy. “And I would do nothing to hurt the U.S. auto industry.”

    That might be considered true—unless moving the most important American auto parts manufacturer to China counts as hurting the U.S. auto industry. But those words now stand as one of Romney’s most glaring falsehoods in the final debate.

    Romney’s defensive statement came in response to a remark by Obama noting that the Republican nominee is “familiar with jobs being shipped overseas because you invested in companies that were shipping jobs overseas.” Moments later, he added: “If we had taken your advice, Governor Romney about our auto industry, we’d be buying cars from China instead of selling cars to China.”

    Most viewers had little idea what Obama was talking about or why Romney felt the need to rebut him so specifically. But their coded exchange almost certainly referred to an investigative report that broke wide on the Internet, without much attention from the mainstream media so far—Greg Palast’s article in The Nation magazine, exposing Romney’s huge profits from Delphi, a crucial auto parts company that moved nearly all of its jobs to China after taking billions in auto bailout money from the Treasury.

    As Palast reported, the Romneys made millions from that intricate deal, put together by one of his main campaign donors, billionaire investor Paul Singer — through a “vulture fund” known as Elliott Management. Having bought up Delphi at fire-sale prices, Singer and his partners essentially blackmailed the Treasury into paying them billions so that Delphi would keep supplying parts to General Motors and Chrysler. They stiffed the company’s pensioners, pocketed the bailout funds, and moved all but four of the firm’s 29 plants to China.

  • Huffington Post: Why Is Everyone on Wall Street So Rich? You Have No Idea. By Michael Levin. Excerpts: John C. Bogle is mad as hell and won't take it anymore, or at least as mad as hell as a dignified, Bible- and Churchill-quoting octogenarian can be. Born just months before the stock market crash of 1929, and the godfather of the mutual fund industry, Bogle is deeply unhappy about how speculators have hijacked the financial markets and kicked investors to Wall Street's famously unforgiving curb.

    ogle writes about this clash of cultures between investors and speculators in a new book titled, fittingly enough, The Clash of the Cultures: Investment vs. Speculation (John Wiley & Sons, $29.95). He demonstrates, in sprightly if mournful tones, that the average share of stock was traded once every seven years when his career started back in 1951 and is now traded every four months. Wall Street is supposed to be about allocating wealth to businesses so they can create jobs and do all those things Romney keeps talking about. Instead, it's just a big casino, and it doesn't even have Celine Dion or a buffet.

    The book is a gem. Well-researched and carefully argued, there's simply no way to argue with Bogle's premises -- that the little guy always loses, that the more you churn the more you lose, that most people's retirements are dramatically underfunded, that management looks out for itself and not the stockholders, and that greed is driving the bus. The book ends with a compelling pitch for Bogle's own Wellington Fund, demonstrating that the author is clearly a salesman to the last.

  • Huffington Post: Sensata Plant Owned By Bain Threatens To Shut Down If Trespassing Protests Continue. By Jason Cherkis. Excerpts: On Tuesday, officials from Bain Capital-owned Sensata Technologies threatened to shut down its north-central Illinois plant "immediately and indefinitely" if those protesting the offshoring of the facility's jobs entered the plant in an act of civil disobedience again, according to local city officials.

    The plant in Freeport, Ill., which is already scheduled to close at the end of the year, has become an embarrassing campaign issue for GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney. The factory's 170 jobs are being relocated to China. Activists and workers have called on Romney to use his influence with Bain to halt the offshoring. ...

    Sensata's saber rattling looked like an empty gesture to Gaulrapp. "They are moving our jobs to China anyway," he said. "It's a moronic statement by them. Everything we've done has been peaceful."

    More than half of the plant's workers have already been laid off. It's unclear how a shutdown would affect the remaining workers. Gaulrapp suggested that it might only affect overtime pay.

    Romney has not been in charge of Bain Capital for years, but he continues to reap the benefits from tax breaks based on his Sensata investments.

  • Washington Post: Angst in Ohio about Bain, Romney donors links to voting machine company. By Bill Turque. Excerpts: Hart InterCivic is an Austin-based voting machine company that serves local governments all over the country. Its clients include Hamilton County, Ohio, which administers elections in Cincinnati. Hart InterCivic also has in its DNA just enough traces of Bain and Co. and Romney campaign donors to trigger serious angst in the liberal blogosphere about the fate of Ohio’s must-have 18 electoral votes.

    Versions of the story have appeared in The Free Press, an Ohio Web site, in addition to Salon and in a liberal blog carried by Forbes. In a nutshell: three of Hart’s five corporate board members are executives of HIG Capital, a global private equity firm that made what it called a “significant” investment in Hart last year. Four HIG executives (Tony Tamer, John Bolduc, Douglas Berman and Brian D. Schwartz) have been identified as Romney bundlers by independent watchdog groups such as the Sunlight Foundation. HIG employees as a whole have donated $338,000 to the Romney campaign this year, according to Open Secrets. Three of them (Tamer, Berman and Bolduc) used to work at Bain. Among the investors in HIG is Solamere, the private equity firm run by Tagg Romney, the candidate’s son. ...

    The Romney connections kindle bitter memories of 2004, when Walden O’Dell, chief executive of Diebold, the Ohio-based voting machine manufacturer, wrote a fundraising letter declaring his commitment to helping deliver the state to George W. Bush. When machine malfunctions and shortages caused long lines and exit polling showed Democrat John Kerry ahead, there were allegations of a stolen election. But Bush won the state by more than 100,000 votes, and the evidence never held up under close scrutiny. Diebold has since sold its election machine division to ES&S, which does business in the state.

  • AlterNet: 10 Filthy-Rich, Tax-Dodging Hypocrites Pushing Disastrous Austerity on America. The Fix the Debt coalition is using the so-called “fiscal cliff” to push the same old corporate agenda of more tax breaks while shifting the burden on to the rest of us. By Sarah Anderson and Scott Klinger. Excerpts: Brace yourself for one of the most aggressive corporate lobbying campaigns of all time. And one of the most hypocritical.

    Fix the Debt” is a coalition of more than 80 CEOs who claim they know best how to deal with our nation’s fiscal challenges. The group boasts a $60 million budget just for the initial phase of a massive media and lobbying campaign.

    The irony is that CEOs in the coalition’s leadership have been major contributors to the national debt they now claim to know how to fix. These are guys who’ve mastered every tax-dodging trick in the book. And now that they’ve boosted their corporate profits by draining the public treasury, how do they propose we put our fiscal house back in order? By squeezing programs for the poor and elderly, including Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.

    Fix the Debt claims their agenda is not just about spending cuts. But when it comes to their tax proposals, they use the slippery term “pro-growth reform” to push for cuts in deductions that are likely to include credits for working families and — you guessed it — more corporate tax breaks. Chief among these is a proposal to switch to a territorial system under which corporate foreign earnings would be permanently exempted (instead of being taxed when they are returned to America).

  • New York Times opinion: Some Are More Unequal Than Others. By Joseph E. Stiglitz. Excerpts: This election has rightly been characterized as one that will deeply affect the future direction of the country: Americans are being given a choice with potentially large consequences. One arena in which there are profound differences that has not been adequately debated is the future course of inequality.

    Mitt Romney has been explicit: inequality should be talked about only in quiet voices behind closed doors. But with the normally conservative magazine The Economist publishing a special series showing the extremes to which American inequality has grown — joining a growing chorus (of which my book “The Price of Inequality” is an example) arguing that the extremes of American inequality, its nature and origins, are adversely affecting our economy — it is an issue that not even the Republicans can ignore. It is no longer just a moral issue, a question of social justice.

    This perhaps provides part of the explanation for why inequality and poverty should suddenly appear as part of the Romney-Ryan makeover, as they attempt to portray themselves (to use a phrase of some 12 years ago) as compassionate conservatives. In Cleveland on Wednesday, Paul Ryan gave a speech that might lead one to conclude that the two Republican candidates were really concerned about poverty. But more revealing than oratory are budget numbers — like those actually contained in the Ryan budget. His budget proposal guts programs that serve those at the bottom, and little could have done more to enrich those at the top than his original tax proposals (like the elimination of capital gains taxes, a position from which he understandably has tried to distance himself). Every other advanced country has recognized the right of everyone to access to health care, and extending access was central to President Obama’s health care reform. Romney and Ryan have criticized that reform, but have said nothing about how or whether they would ensure universal access. Most important, the macroeconomic consequences of the Romney-Ryan economic program would be devastating: growth would slow, unemployment would increase, and just as Americans would need the social protection of government more, the safety net would be weakened. ...

    But Romney’s campaign likes to play tricks with numbers. When he unleashed a tirade against the bottom 47 percent of supposedly freeloading Americans (for which he has since apologized), he failed to note what should have been obvious and has been pointed out repeatedly since he made that remark: those Americans do pay large amounts in taxes. These include (and I’m hardly the first to point this out) payroll taxes, sales taxes, property taxes, excise taxes, and even part of the corporate income taxes that our major corporations manage to pass on to their customers. He failed to note, too, the many older Americans barely above poverty who receive social security payments, for which they contributed through a lifetime of work. Yes, the rich may pay a high and increasing share of the country’s total tax revenue, but that’s only because they have a high and increasing share of our national income— not because their rates have gone up.

    Many of the very rich, like Romney, are avoiding taxes because of numerous loopholes that favor the rich, and capital gains taxes that are taxed at less than half the rate of other income. The 14 percent rate Romney reportedly paid on his income last year is well below that of Americans of comparable income who worked for their money doing things like creating a real business. Tax havens like the Cayman Islands (condemned by the Group20 and all economic experts) facilitate another level of tax avoidance. That the practice is legal is not an economic justification — the loopholes that allow it were put in place by the rich and the bankers, lawyers and lobbyists who serve them so well. We can be sure that the money is not in the Cayman Islands just because it grows faster in the bright sunshine there.

    Putting all this together isn’t the politics of envy, as Romney’s camp likes to complain, or even about shaking a finger at the country’s real freeloaders. It’s about cold, hard economics. Tax avoidance and low rates on capital gains — and the inequality they amplify — are weakening our economy. Were the rich paying their fair share, our deficit would be smaller, and we would be able to invest more in infrastructure, technology and education — investments that would create jobs now and enhance growth in the future. While education is central to restoring America as a land of opportunity, all three of these are crucial for future growth and increases in living standards. Tax havens discourage investment in the United States. Taxing speculators at a lower rate encourages speculation and instability — and draws our most talented young people out of more productive endeavors. The result is a distorted, inefficient economy that grows more slowly than it should.

  • AlterNet: Why Big Bucks Donors Don't Want President Obama to Champion Social Security. After stock market shocks and the housing bubble, social security more vital than ever before. But the money men hate it. By Dean Baker. Excerpts: t is remarkable that social security hasn't been a more prominent issue in the presidential race. After all, Governor Romney has proposed a plan that would imply cuts of more than 40% for middle-class workers just entering the labor force. Since social security is hugely popular across the political spectrum, it would seem that President Obama could gain an enormous advantage by clearly proclaiming his support for the program.

    But President Obama has consistently refused to rise to the defense of social security. In fact, in the first debate, he explicitly took the issue off the table, telling the American people that there is not much difference between his position on social security and Romney's. ...

    It would be great if we had reason to believe that the generations that followed had better retirement prospects, but we don't. Even in good times, the 401(k) system does more to enrich the financial industry than to provide a secure retirement income. Any reasonable projection indicates that social security will provide the bulk of retirement income for most middle-class retirees long into the future. In this context, the idea of cutting back benefits, even for younger workers, seems misguided. ...

    But there is another set of economic considerations affecting the politics of social security. These considerations involve the economics of the political campaigns and the candidates running for office. The story here is a simple one: while social security may enjoy overwhelming support across the political spectrum, it does not poll nearly as well among the wealthy people – who finance political campaigns and own major news outlets. The predominant philosophy among this group is that a dollar in a workers' pocket is a dollar that could be in a rich person's pocket – and these people see social security putting lots of dollars in the pockets of people who are not rich. ...

    For this reason, a candidate who comes out for protecting social security can expect to see a hit to their campaign contributions. They also can anticipate being beaten up in both the opinion and news sections of major media outlets. While, in principle, these are supposed to be kept strictly separate, the owners and/or top management of most news outlets feel no qualms about removing this separation when it comes to social security – and using news space to attack those who defend social security.

If you hire good people and treat them well, they will try to do a good job. They will stimulate one another by their vigor and example. They will set a fast pace for themselves. Then if they are well led and occasionally inspired, if they understand what the company is trying to do and know they will share in its sucess, they will contribute in a major way. The customer will get the superior service he is looking for. The result is profit to customers, employees, and to stcckholders. —Thomas J. Watson, Jr., from A Business and Its Beliefs: The Ideas That Helped Build IBM.

This site is designed to allow IBM Employees to communicate and share methods of protecting their rights through the establishment of an IBM Employees Labor Union. Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act states it is a violation for Employers to spy on union gatherings, or pretend to spy. For the purpose of the National Labor Relations Act, notice is given that this site and all of its content, messages, communications, or other content is considered to be a union gathering.